Just as a general rule. Not specifically wanting to know about Iran.
2006-08-21 07:08:31 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Absolutely not... it's best to let them develop it and mount it on a rocket... THEN you stop them... that launching site will be unusable for years.
2006-08-21 07:30:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
1st off, I think the label of "terrorist sponsoring nation" is subjective, and used to demonize a people or state, often times. I say let it be. It's real hypocritical for Uncle Sam to have tons of nukes, but tell others that they can't have no nuclear weapons.
I don't think it's rite to label Hezbollah as a "terrorist" group. It is a well-organized, effective, popular party, which has both military and political wings. Also, Hezbollah provides many important services to Lebanese people, especially those living in South Lebanon. The Israelis are the "terrorists"! Long live Hezbollah!
2006-08-21 08:17:21 · answer #2 · answered by solipsistic 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, we should stop them. States like Iran do not put the same value on human life as we do. They would think that they were doing what Allah wants them to do by firing nuclear missiles at all non Muslim countries, thus wiping out all "infidels," which are billions of innocent men, women and children.
2006-08-21 14:13:27 · answer #3 · answered by celticwoman777 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
maximum will agree that we ought to continuously attempt to do all that we can to stay away from a terrorist united states from arising nuclear guns. even with the undeniable fact that, i visit make certain each and each side of this argument. What provides the rustic the right to inform different international places what they could and can't do? we've quite a seize 22 situation on our hands right here. the reality even with the undeniable fact that is once Bush is out of workplace, if we decide a conservative president, i'm positive he/she might want to do what's significant to stay away from progression of a weapon of mass destruction. even with the undeniable fact that, if our united states is so mad at Bush that we decide a liberal president, i might want to be quite in touch that a liberal might want to target to placate, cajole, appease, talk, negotiate with a terrorist sponsoring united states to stay away from them from arising a nuclear weapon. those terror international locations are literally not dumb. they receives all they could from a liberal united states authorities and nevertheless improve their weapon. TX guy
2016-11-26 21:33:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope, but if we get any hint that they are going to use them, then bunker-buster bomb their facilities into oblivion. :)
2006-08-21 07:37:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋