What do you think of the statements today that troops will be in Iraq until at least January of 2009???????
2006-08-21 06:55:12 · 6 answers · asked by trouthunter 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I don't think it's gonna happen, because he's a lying liar, if he has any say, it will be longer... But I wish they'd be out September 2006.
2006-08-21 07:17:16 · answer #1 · answered by RATM 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not surprised, although I haven't seen or heard his statement yet. They need to keep a military presence simply because they are planning a much broader scale attack on other Arab nations and will need stations there to aid in this attack on Iran and Syria. Plus, the oil is still flowing, why would they leave?? This bull**** that they are there"to help the Iraqi people" is completely false. The Iraqi people want them to help like I want help from a child molester to raise my kids.
2006-08-21 07:05:42 · answer #2 · answered by one voice 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well he did say the resolution of Iraq will be left to a future president. He'll wave and say good luck from Crawford by then.
2006-08-21 07:03:45 · answer #3 · answered by Ron D 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not surprising. That means till the end of his presidency.
2006-08-21 07:08:19 · answer #4 · answered by kingstubborn 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I was surprised...that he actually told the truth!
2006-08-21 07:10:42 · answer #5 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is an idiot
2006-08-21 07:11:22 · answer #6 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋