English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is Israel threatenig to kill Nasrallah and bombing of Southern Lebanon after cease fire acts of terrorism? Israeli primeminister has taken a vow to kill nasrallah the Hizbollah Leader? I think Israel should be warned by the world community. And if it ever does so It must be attacked and forced to dismantle its nuclear facilities! After killing hundreds of Lebanese and turning thousands homeless Israel has lost its right to kill Nasrallah. Now The father America has objections in the humanitarian works being carried out by Hizbollah and also Irans help to the victims. George Bush seem to have gone insane/maniac.

2006-08-21 05:42:10 · 5 answers · asked by yahooman 1 in Politics & Government Politics

5 answers

You just don't get it. Another liberal that does not have common sense.

You know how many treaties Israel signed that were violated by the people that signed them first? It's foolish to sign ANY UN
"resolution".

Remember those two soldiers that we kidnapped by the Hez-bos that started this whole thing again? That "resolution" didn't say they should be returned...
The UN wanted to stop this "conflict" because the Hezb-bos were about wiped out. I wish Israel could have worked faster to wipe them out. There will not be peace in the middle east until a clear VICTOR and loser is decided.

Remember Egypt and Israel their conflict? Israel wiped the floor with Egypt and wanted a peace treaty and it still is in tact because Egypt learned their lesson.

2006-08-21 05:51:17 · answer #1 · answered by John 3 · 0 0

Things you can't argue with:

1)Hezbollah didn't attack Israel and capture people; No war in the first place.

2)Military weapons in the hands of civilians\non-governmental militias is bad.

Things I don't care to argue about:

1)Israel is a racist state.

2)Israel has lots of prisoners.

Just remember that whenever anyone oppresses or attacks the other its wrong. And Hezbollah broke the cease-fire agreement first by disarming. I won't argue that Israel "needed" to or "should" attack positions in Lebanon. But, I will say they clearly had the right to do so. Even if it's a crappy decision for peace, IMHO.

2006-08-21 12:56:29 · answer #2 · answered by BigPappa 5 · 0 0

Late last month, a fortnight into Israel’s war against Lebanon, the Hebrew media published a story that passed observers by. Scientists in Haifa, according to the report, have developed a “missile-trapping” steel net that can shield buildings from rocket attacks. The Israeli government, it noted, would be able to use the net to protect vital infrastructure -- oil refineries, hospitals, military installations, and public offices -- while private citizens could buy a net to protect their own homes.

The fact that the government and scientists are seriously investing their hopes in such schemes tells us more about Israel’s vision of the “new Middle East” than acres of analysis.

Israel regards the “home front” -- its civilian population -- as its Achilles’ heel in the army’s oppression of the Palestinians in the occupied territories, its intermittent invasions of south Lebanon, and its planned attacks further afield. The military needs the unconditional support of the country’s citizenry and media to sanction its unremitting aggression against Israel’s “enemies”, but fears that the resolve of the home front is vulnerable to the threat posed by rockets landing in Israel, whether the home-made Qassams fired by Palestinians over the walls of their prison in Gaza or the Katyushas launched by Hizbullah from Lebanon.

Certainly Israel’s leaders are not ready to examine the reasons for the rocket menace -- or to search for solutions other than of the missile-catching variety.

The bloody nose Israel received in south Lebanon has not shaken its leaders’ confidence in their restless militarism. If anything, their humiliation has given them cause to pursue their adventures more vigorously in an attempt to reassert the myth of Israeli invincibility, to distract domestic attention from Israel’s defeat at the hands of Hizbullah, and to prove the Israeli army’s continuing usefulness to its generous American benefactor.

If Israel’s soldiers ever leave south Lebanon, expect a rapid return to the situation before the war of almost daily violations of Lebanese airspace by its warplanes and spy drones, plus air strikes to “rein in” Hizbullah and regular attempts on its leader Hassan Nasrallah’s life.

2006-08-21 13:02:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

they'll never do this since hezbollah is an israeli agent... hezbollah captured those two israeli soldiers so that Israel gets a reason to attack lebanon.....
get the pic....
this is what they do all the time....
they act infront of the world that they r rivals but really they r buddies..

2006-08-21 12:51:12 · answer #4 · answered by Apple 4 · 0 1

yes

2006-08-21 14:24:13 · answer #5 · answered by doctor asho 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers