English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Iran's leaders are refusing to comply with the dates previously agreed upon for UN inspections.

Wonderfuly enough, the white house has mentioned that in a hope for diplomatic resolution, they might consider allowing them public nuclear programs (such as power plants).

Sounds like North Korea a few decades ago to me.

2006-08-21 05:32:23 · 13 answers · asked by amosunknown 7 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

I love how already a number of people have sited this is a problem with the Bush administration.

Last time I checked Bush didnt make up the UN. In fact, last time I checked the US had a SEAT at the UN.

Hmmm. Its a difficult concept I suppose.

2006-08-21 06:00:11 · update #1

Biomintekcoislef? I didnt read your name all the way...

WTF, did you answer the wrong question?

2006-08-21 06:18:27 · update #2

13 answers

And this is a surprise to anyone?

Iran has been saying all along that it retains its sovereign right to pursue civil nuclear reactor technology, and that it does not intend to stop its enrichment program just because other countries don't like it.

2006-08-21 05:38:52 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2 1

Surprise,surprise, surprise reality back hands the bushies again. This is getting to be a habit. They rant and rave about middle eastern evils then finally admit that can't do jack about it. The Iranians are going to get there bomb and it can't be stopped. So get use to it and let them know if they use the stupid thing there country will cease to exist the same way we handled the soviets. Eventually the Iranians will figure out nukes are expensive dust collectors. Nukes are defensive weapons in nature used to keep opponents from invading your country to use them offensively means the enemies territory becomes worthless and nothing is gained. Religious insanity is a wild card that requires a deft hand at diplomacy to keep the froot loops in check something this prez is totally lacking. Hope the next prez is a thinker not a knuckle dragger.

2006-08-21 12:53:39 · answer #2 · answered by brian L 6 · 1 0

YOU ARE DAMN FLAWED

The U.S. government has been, and continues to be, a major supporter of state-supported terrorism, favoring retaliatory or preemptive aggression over mediation in the world court, and avoiding accountability by excluding itself from the globally accepted definition of terrorism.

The fundamental essence of PNAC's ideology can be found in a White Paper produced in September of 2000 entitled "Rebuilding America's Defenses:
Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century." In it, PNAC outlines what is required of America to create the global empire they envision.
According to PNAC, America must:
* Reposition permanently based forces to Southern Europe, Southeast Asia and the Middle East;
* Modernize U.S. forces, including enhancing our fighter aircraft, submarine and surface fleet capabilities;
* Develop and deploy a global missile defense system, and develop a strategic dominance of space;
* Control the "International Commons" of cyberspace;
* Increase defense spending to a minimum of 3.8 percent of gross domestic product, up from the 3 percent currently spent.

My advice to Americans is to take a hard look in the mirror, and ask yourselves why your country is committing horrendous terrorist acts on the soils of other countries. The destruction of Iraq and the horror brought forth by American war on the Iraqi people, and America’s other countless atrocities rob America of all moral authority and idealism.

2006-08-21 13:09:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I thought that bringing Democracy to Iraq was only the beginning to bringing Democracy to the region. . So, what is the problem? They are simply following the Bush agenda. Didn't you hear his press conference this morning? God help us and the world.

2006-08-21 12:52:08 · answer #4 · answered by GRANNY12GR1 4 · 1 0

I am certainly not surprised by the inability of the Bush Administration to play chess in terms of Foreign Policy. Bush and Company have become a blight on our American body politic and government. They really should be retired at this point or placed into receivership.

2006-08-21 12:44:31 · answer #5 · answered by zclifton2 6 · 3 2

Non of anybodys' business .
why don't u find another case to interfere in . ( u r really American ) , just live and let others live.
why u r not concerned about the nuclear power of the loser Israel . why is that no one is questioning it about their nuclear bombs.
WHAT A DISCRIMINATION .
U R REALLY AMERICAN
U R ALL THE SAME.

2006-08-21 13:38:14 · answer #6 · answered by Brave Heart 3 · 1 0

Islamofascism has to be defeated. If we deal with Iran, decisively, it will cut the head of Islamofascism and stop substantial financial support to terrorism.

We, in the West, will have to come to the realization that we will have to take the same steps as we did in Japan to deal with Iran. Unfortunate, but necessary. Iran is intent on building nuclear weapons, and is a continuous sponsor of terror around the world. Islamofascism must be eradicated.

2006-08-21 13:18:30 · answer #7 · answered by EDDie 5 · 0 3

I think its interesting that you evoked a North Korea reference..

seems to me both N.Korea and Iran are reacting to the presence of Americans Troops on their border, making threats and rattling sabres - should anybody be surprised when a cornered animal bears its teeth??

2006-08-21 12:41:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

When I smell something funny in the house I call my four year old to see if he's messed his pants. If he has something to hide he will tell me no when I want to look.
Same goes for Iran, if they don't have something to hide, then why won't they let the inspectors look?

2006-08-21 12:42:25 · answer #9 · answered by zhadowlord 3 · 1 2

Typical.

2006-08-21 12:40:47 · answer #10 · answered by yahoohoo 6 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers