all of the matches wer pretty much crap. it only had one good match. the wwe championship match. if it wuz there it would have been one of the greatest matches.
2006-08-21 05:24:06 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
No the Great Khali is a 7ft2 piece of wasted roster the undertaker should have fought kurt angle or someone it would have made summerslam a little better
plus the smackdown match was edited to **** we saw a little less then half of it
2006-08-21 05:44:02 · answer #1 · answered by Jared 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The last man standing match was schedule as SummerSlam months before the last minute change. They thought the Great Khali had room to improve his wrestling skill before the August 20 date but with being calling in sick at The Great American Bash, as well as the lack of wrestling time on Smackdown and house show force management to schedule the match on Smackdown before SummerSlam. They didn't see any improvement from Khali at all and the reason he was on Smackdown was because he didn't "perform" well live in the first place when he got called up from OVW (they just thought that he can get away with his size). The likely hood of this is that Davari is going to have to lose his third client in two years, I think (Muhammed Hassan was written off after the London bombing and Mark Henry injured himself at SNME) as Khali would likely be sent down to OVW to reinvent his character or release him outright.
2006-08-21 14:20:13 · answer #2 · answered by mojo8983 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The reason for the change of the match to Friday is that Kahli is not "good enough" to do a PPV. Taker would have had to carry him the whole way. By doing it Friday night, WWE could edit the televised version making it a much better match!
Kahli needs a lot of help. Maybe sometime in the non televised ring would help him tremendously.
2006-08-21 13:39:27 · answer #3 · answered by Blond Logic 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it would of been history in the making on Pay-Per-View but right now, it is history right on live television. And in my opinion, I Loved every bit of it!!! Because it's not many matches like that you would see on live television!!!
2006-08-21 12:42:30 · answer #4 · answered by jeweezy2002 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell freakin no, Khali is a waste of airtime.
2006-08-21 12:43:30 · answer #5 · answered by Dawn of PacMan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yea it could have been a classic....i m pretty sure it wud've been better than the hogan match..lol
2006-08-21 12:31:34 · answer #6 · answered by CodeRed 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it was awesome! i was so happy to see taker kick khali's @ss!
2006-08-22 13:05:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
who cares... theres better things to watch on tv..like bugs bunny
2006-08-21 12:58:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, but they did not want to take a chance.
2006-08-24 13:20:12 · answer #9 · answered by chris m 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No duh it would have good enough!! Summerslam was "the biggest party of the summer" and they were not invited
2006-08-21 12:41:34 · answer #10 · answered by .......... 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋