Was World Trade Centre 7 was a controlled demolition?
2006-08-21 05:05:24 · 24 answers · asked by 911wasaninsidejob 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
WTC 1 and 2 were hit each hit by an aeroplane,
and they collapsed. Many, including myself, believe an incindiery explosive, possibly thermate, was used in their destruction.
However, WTC 7 was NOT hit by a plane and did NOT suffer major fires, and yet, incredibly it collapsed into its own footprint in 6.5 seconds.
In 100 years of steel frame building construction, NO STEEL FRAME BUILDING HAS EVER COLLAPSED SOLELY DUE TO FIRE, even though many have burned MUCH HOTTER and FOR MUCH LONGER.
... Except, we are told, WTC 7.
Hence my question:
If WTC 7 wasn't a controlled demolition, then how did it collapse?
And if it was a controlled demolition, which the video footage looks exactly like, then who expertly placed the explosives to implode the building?
2006-08-24 05:16:10 · update #1
Even when Jesus was around people didn't believe him, so it's no surprise that some still don't.
You think it was an inside job, good for you. Don't bother the rest of us with all this nonsense.
An aeroplane even without jet fuel, flying at such a speed, not to mention a 747, will bring any skyscraper down, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out.
2006-08-25 05:44:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
an act of God? some will say that debris fell from the towers after this diesel fuel was on fire and did some damage and because it was a 47 story building the substructure was weakened and consequently after 9 hours of burning it collapsed. never mind that 5 and 6 had way more severe burns than 7. maybe wtc7 didn't collapse. it was imploded
2006-08-25 08:05:45 · answer #2 · answered by w c 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no WTC 7. There were only two. Each tower was hit by a big jet full of fuel!! Besides the towers, were built different than a regular Steel building.
2006-08-28 08:30:40 · answer #3 · answered by alfonso 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would question your statement about other fires being hotter.. when one consideres the volume of fuel carried by those planes, in an enclosed area (basically), the intensity is magnified..As was well established by the engineers (who spent many months digesting the situation), giving a very vaiid explanation. Sorry you missed it!
In case you aren't aware; every incident that occurs seems to have an immediate conspiracy theory pop up.. None are excluded.. is good for creating interest but serves no other valid purpose.
2006-08-27 07:33:54 · answer #4 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course it was a controlled demolition. The whole official story doesn't have a shred of credibility. As a retired general recently said, if our government had done nothing on 9/11, the planes would have been intercepted by NORAD. There had to have been a "stand down" order.
My question is: Who gave that order?
This was the "another Pearl Harbor" suggested by the purveyors of PNAC (Project for the New American Century) that would be necessary to gain public support to implement their blueprint for the new 21st Century American empire. starting with (you guessed it) Iraq, Iran , Syria...It just keeps getting better!
Get on board, now, boys and girls!
2006-08-26 06:10:25 · answer #5 · answered by psycheknot 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The building was on fire by a tremendous heat and the fuel from the planes were full tanks and all that fuel soaked right into the floors beneath each other. It was a time bomb ready to go off and it did. JP4 JP5 are both highly flammable Jet fuels. End of Story!!
2006-08-27 11:41:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes. i am completely sure it was an inside job... by our own government. the two buildings both collapsed at an impossible speed. those planes should have only harmed the top floors of those buildings and the main support beams of the building had not been touched. the buildings actually fell with the help of explosives, that were used to take out the main support beams. some say that the building just bured at inncredible speed, but no. also the building were burning at a temperature higher than jet fuel can burn, by at least two thousand degrees, therefore proving that there were explosives involved.
please try to find a copy of "loose change", or "loose change II" for more details. or go online to http://www.911research.com.
2006-08-23 07:36:19 · answer #7 · answered by haha183 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
WTC 7 caught on fire from the exploding jet fuel and as in the larger towers the structural steel melted causing the collapse. There was no conspiracy and the government was not involved. Get your head out of your butt and use your brain,
2006-08-21 05:26:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Get a life and quit looking for something that didn't happen.
Ask yourself why anyone (government included) other than Al Qaeda or their like would really want to take down the WTC? What motive would they have?
2006-08-29 03:20:41 · answer #9 · answered by namsaev 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
On inspection faulty construction led to the collapse with the heating of the structure from burning jet fuel. The constuction was controversial at the time it was built. and we will never know if it had been built differently whether it would have stood or fallen.
2006-08-26 08:03:59 · answer #10 · answered by longroad 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋