He's a very creepy individual, but I don't think he killed her. He's either looking for attention or he's convinced himself he killed her. Like you, though, I think there are way too many inconsistencies in his story.
2006-08-21 04:56:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by cool_breeze_2444 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes, there are many inconsistencies but to many questions about his statments, recently a fellow classmate of kerr came foward with a yearbook signed by him in the eighties he signed it SBTC the same mysterious name on the JonBenet ransom letter. the way she was killed with that choking device is just to harsh for a mother of many children to use on her little baby she never abused any of her children why would she start? if hes not guilty he sure as hell acts guilty and if he is think of patsy dying with the whole world believing that she killed her baby. it really so sad.
2006-08-21 06:20:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i imagine it became an interloper.. possibly a foreigner or a member of a sadistic pedophilia crew. I say that in accordance to intuitive imaginative and prescient more beneficial than actual deduction. i recognize that what Patsy did in cleansing the evidence became extraordinarily suspicious and unhelpful, yet in her personal extraordinarily despairing concepts on the time, pondering how some people are type of conservative neatfreaks /niceknicks (not understanding if she became or not) i am going to genuinely see the cleansing taking position quote unquote innocently. it would want to also be a way of psychological denial of reality, hiding from the international. It turned right into a terrribly unhappy element for all.
2016-11-05 07:31:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
, i believe either he was really obsessed with JonBenet or his family is lying about seeing him on the day that Jonbenet was killed. Just take a look at him he looks like a sick little boy who just. needs some love and therapy.
2006-08-21 04:57:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by GoodtoKnow♥ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
after expert analysis of the "ransom note",it is quite clear to
me that Patsy Ramsey accidently killed Jon-Benet,possibly
by some type of abuse.She wrote the ransom note to mislead
the investigators into thinking there was a kidnapping plot.John
Ramsey knew all along,but kept quiet.After this John Karr
story broke,John Ramsey stated he is leaving the country.
No,this John Karr is a liar.He did not do it.
2006-08-21 05:21:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by mitchegen 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think he's very disturbed. And, definately CREEPY! His eyes are so strange...did anyone else notice that? He's more creepy than Ted Bundy and Son of Sam put together!
But, doubtful he really did it. I agree - too many inconsistancies.
BTW: DNA evidence is not absolute. And, in law school we are made to study DNA techonology. I think more people should really look into this new science...you'd be surprised!
Chances are about 1 in 1,000 of a false negative or postive...but the what if factor is huge. Like what if it exhonerated this guy...or the guy that kidnapped your child...
2006-08-21 04:55:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Baby #3 due 10/13/09 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Not sure if he killed her. I think it was a good plot to get him out of the country he was in. Many people do this for the publicity. Quite honestly, the guy has many issues, and maybe he is adp, he has some serious mental issues.
2006-08-21 04:57:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think the inconsistencies matter. What did the DNA evidence say? I think if he took this long to confess it may be true. A media whore would have come forward a lot sooner.
2006-08-21 04:56:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Starlight 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think he's just a sicko looking for attention. Fortunately, we have a DNA sample from JonBenet, so this question should be easily answered.
2006-08-21 04:55:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by FozzieBear 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
No I don't at this point but will wait for the DNA test. He is strange to say the least.
2006-08-21 04:55:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Shar 6
·
1⤊
0⤋