English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Imagine having a spouse that understands the need for bedskirts and buying things on sale.
Or the purpose for not talking during the last 5 minutes of a football game or buying a tool because you "might" need it.

2006-08-21 04:40:44 · 21 answers · asked by parkdad73 1 in Family & Relationships Marriage & Divorce

21 answers

And, as Jerry Seinfeld said, if you're the same size you just doubled your wardrobe!

2006-08-21 04:46:01 · answer #1 · answered by They call me ... Trixie. 7 · 1 0

Given the level of hostility that Americans show towards same-sex unions of any kind, the chief advantage of a same-sex marriage would be that both partners want to be together more than they fear all the hate they will surely face. Contrast this with the typical mixed sex marriage where people often get married because of all the social expectation and pressure that they get married and start producing brats.

2006-08-21 11:50:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It depends on the people in the marriage it makes no difference if they are same sex or different sex. Its up to both people to make a marriage work.

2006-08-21 11:46:02 · answer #3 · answered by courage 6 · 0 0

I wouldn't think same sex marriage would be better than hetero sex marriage, because marriage is marriage, still 2 people uniting in one. and both people have differences. I think they're just all the same.

2006-08-21 11:47:06 · answer #4 · answered by superboredom 6 · 0 0

The species would die out from no new babies being born to these same sex couples. I would suggest keeping mixed marriages but getting a friend to shop and discuss decorating with.

2006-08-21 11:46:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

In one of his radio broadcasts, Dr. William Pierce said something about homosexuals that the queers didn't like, so one of them, using insult as a form of argument, sent him a photograph of his naked butt. I happened to see that photo in his office.

In the photo, the queer's anus was stretched at least six inches wide - easily! The interior of his rectum resembled a bloody cavern or a great, gaping wound between his buttocks. It was difficult for me to understand, at first, that queers think that this harmful result of their disgusting, perverted sexual acts is "natural." Obviously, if it were "natural," the queers' bodies would not become deformed in that way.

When you see a Gay Pride march, you're probably looking at a bunch of men whose pursuit of rectal sex and rectal fisting and rectal hamstering and weird enemas has destroyed their sphincter muscles so badly that they should be wearing diapers to avoid dropping incontinent piles of poop on the street.

2006-08-21 11:54:51 · answer #6 · answered by David S 5 · 0 0

not in the next whenever years
the selfish will persue that
but for the purpose or reproduction
and the fact that a generation dies and another genration is born is never going to happen

2006-08-21 11:47:27 · answer #7 · answered by maku d 3 · 0 0

According to US law - no. In the US you can marry your cousin in more states than you can marry someone of the same sex. Of course, this does explain a thing or two.

2006-08-21 11:46:06 · answer #8 · answered by j_f_sebastian82 3 · 1 0

I don't think it makes a different.. same sex.. different sex.. people need to learn to talk and compromise if they want a relationship to work...

2006-08-21 12:21:52 · answer #9 · answered by Lyne B 3 · 0 0

A mixed marriage is not a sin.

2006-08-21 11:47:10 · answer #10 · answered by kelliekareen 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers