provide logistics and command-and-control. In other words, other countries will contribute the peacekeepers, but the US will provide "assistance" by commanding them. Since when did commanding troops become a "contribution"?
2006-08-21 04:25:10 · 8 answers · asked by Paul D 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
France should be the commanding force.
2006-08-21 05:38:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with the first answer that sending in ground troops has a good chance of being detrimental to the overall peace keeping force. However, I believe that Bush and Co. do not have the right to denigrate other countries (like France) for the number of troops they are willing to send.
2006-08-21 05:34:40 · answer #2 · answered by John J 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Commanding is a contribution. In fact, it is a very good contribution, and one I hope will be accepted. Each country has to consider what it has to offer, and in this case, with the confusion about loyalties that exists in Lebanon, it might be the most intelligent contribution.
2006-08-21 05:13:46 · answer #3 · answered by lottyjoy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Before you decide to rip the U.S. government a new one for their stance on this
TRY USING YOUR HEAD.
Think for a minute, it won't hurt too much, I promise.
What do you think would happen if U.S. troops set foot in Lebanon?
Whether rightly or wrongly, how many Muslims (Hezbollah and their supporters) would trust U.S. troops to be fair in dealing with them and Israel?
The reason that the U.S. is not sending troops is because nobody wants U.S. troops there.
Instead of helping to keep the ceasefire, U.S. troops would result in the ending of the ceasefire as the U.S. is not trusted by those it would be keeping from fighting.
Try thinking before spouting your drivel and attacking the U.S. You obviously have ABSOLUTELY no grasp of international diplomacy, you only wish to badmouth what you know nothing about.
2006-08-21 04:56:38 · answer #4 · answered by urbanbulldogge 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
how are you able to assert they do no longer agree once you may no longer even submit a hyperlink to coach they disagree? there has been senate testimony to the effect that bankers have been compelled to make undesirable loans. The regulations are in place for all those that desires to look at them or perhaps you ought to look up the form of incorrect debtors that have lost their properties via government subsidized loans. Get off your tail and stop mendacity approximately issues. do somewhat learn and definitely learn some thing. Its all there, top in front of you. All you will possibly desire to do is open your eyes and look quite of arising issues up.
2016-10-02 08:55:36 · answer #5 · answered by goldfield 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dont forget bush is again taking care of someother country,by sending 250 million dollars to help rebuild lebanon,we dont need it in this country,everyones doing great here in america,what an asshole
2006-08-21 06:31:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is ugliest from U.S if it share in a peacekeeping force in Lebanon.US support Israel by all prohibited weapons it possesses,nuclear,chemical and biological weapons.and all its modern forces and army.it use it to kill infants.children,women's and elderly in Lebanon.it made all its crimes with a full support from US.US PROLONG THE TIME TO GIVE ISRAEL THE CHANCE TO KILL ,DESTROY AND MAKE ALL ITS CRIMES IN LEBANON.US IS A PARTAKES ON THE BLOODIES OF THE LEBANON'S INFANTS ,CHILDREN ,ELDERLY AND WOMEN.US IS A PARTAKES OF ALL CRIMES OF ISRAEL.
2006-08-21 05:07:15 · answer #7 · answered by peace 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
diatribe not a question
2006-08-21 05:03:46 · answer #8 · answered by carl l 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋