What would you rate it out of 10
2006-08-21 04:18:42 · 18 answers · asked by jimmy 2 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
i give it a 7/10,Why??
Ok Smackdown's got it's fair share of great talent.but they're forcing fan-favorites like Scotty 2 Hotty,Matt Hardy and London+Kendrick to lose to new people like Sylvestor Turkay,K.C. James+Idol Stevens.
I like Smackdown more than RAW because Smackdown has more wrestling than talking.Another thing,THE GIMMICKS.Boogeyman's is annoying.Have you seen that EVERY match he's been in is a total squash and ends within 1 to 3 minutes?
King Booker/Booker T=He walks reallly,really slowly half way down the ramp.Looks at everyone.Walks even more slowly down the ramp.Stops.Gets in the ring and sits on a big chair.I'd like it much more better if he went back to normal, "Can you dig it?Suckkaaaaaa" Booker T and not "ALLLLL HAILLLL KINNG BOOOOOKER!!" Booker T.
Overall, Smackdown's ok.THey gotta make these improvments if they wanna get more fans though,
-Get rid of Mark Henry.
-Make Khali a babyface (that'd be cool....)
-Get rid of that rat divari
-And last but not least,STOP GIVING NEW PEOPLE A PUSH!!!
2006-08-21 04:31:57 · answer #1 · answered by shatteryear 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Smackdown is currently crippled, its hard to rate at this point. It would be a nice grounds to bring cruiserweights into but it doesnt seem to be utilizing anyone worth a crap by having so many on there. Having squashers on the show is lame too, they should move them to RAW with the big boys, and fire Khali or repackage him somehow, a mask would do. He wouldnt be as big when he got back cuz he has to ditch the roid/growth hormone use. Guy probably has a heart the size of a soccer ball by now.
Overall rating? 5, its average, if im home, ill watch it *maybe*, depends who is up for the night on the roster. If it looks lame, nah.
2006-08-21 13:08:36 · answer #2 · answered by Dawn of PacMan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
7
2006-08-21 11:23:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
9\10
2006-08-21 15:16:12 · answer #4 · answered by Sweety 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lately a 3. TNA is better than Smackdown.
2006-08-21 11:24:11 · answer #5 · answered by famu1226 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Smackdown has younger superstars so in a few years they will be big also smackdown is on earlier (EST) than raw which is good for me b/c i go to school, also i am a big Batista fan
2006-08-21 12:15:48 · answer #6 · answered by btamlind 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Smackdown is like the minor league to raw. proof is summerslam smackdown had only 2 matches and vince is pro smackdown.
2006-08-21 11:23:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Smackdown should go now because they haven't got any good story lines and most of their superstars are too old or new ones that are about 150 pounds
2006-08-21 12:31:47 · answer #8 · answered by HHH 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think its neat because i watch it every friday night unless i have something to do that night.Hey do u like ECW because if you do you can watch live in Niagara Falls,NY next month sept 17 2006 at 3:00
2006-08-21 11:27:31 · answer #9 · answered by Tommy L 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pro wrestling is a joke. A big stage show of full grown men making asses of there selfs
2006-08-21 11:56:24 · answer #10 · answered by Harry W 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋