A 5 star has more to offer and you are received much better.
Your room amenities are of to days extras. e.g. 42" LCD flat screen. Wireless connection for you lap top.
2006-08-24 16:18:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Carl A 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definitely a five star is better. Some developing countries mislead tourists in there Star rating. So a three may just be a two star etc. 5 Star has better services too besides bigger rooms and more amenitites. Most service personel are friendly too.
2006-08-21 05:01:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by dolphin 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
A 5 star is a luxury hotel and a 3 star is just average
2006-08-21 04:22:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by dwh12345 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
2 stars
2006-08-21 07:04:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by frank f 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
2 stars, is that it?
a 5 star hotel is known to be better than a 3 star
"the more stars, the better"
2006-08-25 02:58:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by some pip 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
this answer is quite simple realy in a 3 star the facilities may not be as bril or clean or modern e.g 5 star ud have a plasma and dvd player (unlike a 3 star you usualy get a mini crapy telle *laugh*) ....and better room desighn...e.t.c oh and you have sky in a 5 star. in a 5 star it will be better food more modern and posh and would probabably be in superb view e.g looking over a beech.
2016-03-27 00:00:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i believe most hotels are rated using the diamond system; but yes, more is better.
2006-08-21 04:27:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by dr schmitty 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on quality.
2006-08-21 04:29:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋