Should the Western powers use a pre-emptive nuclear strike to wipe out the Iranian nuclear facilities AND the oil fields. That would reduce the Iranians to a primitive backward and poor nation which seems to be what they deserve.
2006-08-21 04:08:06 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Nuclear Power by Muslim states is against humanity and mainly against non muslims.The hidden agenda is a muslim take over of the world.The Muslim philosophy is all non muslims should be killed and there should be only muslims in this world.The preventive factor now is powerful USA.Terrorists want to weaken USA and rest is easy.The plot is hatched by Pakistan,Iran,Bangladesh,Arabs etc.While technology is provided/sold by Pakistan ,money is provided by oil rich Arab countries.By helping Pakistan ,USA is digging their own grave yard.Nuclear preemptive destruction of Pakistan,Iran and Muslim countries is the immediate requirement if USA wants to survive.Better be it now so that infuture world will not regrett.
2006-08-21 23:30:40 · answer #1 · answered by leowin1948 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Good God...no wonder countries like Iran are wanting to build a nuclear arsenal with idiots like you about.
Pre-emptive Nuclear strikes would solve nothing except cause needless suffering to thousands and radicalize the entire muslim world against the West. Nuclear weapons shouldnt exist at all.
I think it's very hypocritical for the US to say Iran cant have nuclear weapons when it is sitting on the biggest stockpile of the things in the world. Because we are democratic, it doesnt mean we are less likely to use them.
You cannot presume to judge a country based on propaganda written in the West as it attempts to justify an invasion of Iran pre-emptively. What gives you the right?!
2006-08-21 11:18:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes,
but if that fails send out Ant & Dec or Simon Cowell & Sharon Osborne and bore the fuckers into submission.
Someone commented here that if Britain & USA have the bomb why shouldnt Iran?. Well i think if we have to put up with Pop Idol or Im a Celebrity get me outta here then Iran can bloody well have that too tommorrow.
Im a celebrity in Tehran get me outta here!. Has a ring to it, unfortunately half the sane population of Iran are shouting it.
2006-08-21 14:07:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Quite agree that for Iran to develop nuclear weapons and as you say supply them to other 'volatile' nations could be a disaster for not only USA & UK but for the stability of the whole world. As it is I think we all know who has these weapons and who does not but with someone like Iran having access to supply others would create all sorts of other problems. However I dont think that attacking a nation in the way you suggest would improve the situation, but undoubtedly encourage other like thinking countries to react in a very volatile manner & things would just escalate beyond control........ its most definitely not the way
2006-08-21 11:23:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Israel is sitting on all those nuclear war heads and that dont bother u... N korea keeps on showing middle finger to the so called peace stablisher on earth .. that dont bother u ... but when ever an arab counrty wants to gain power u are threatened....hmmmm... what makes u so scared brother?? fears that the cat will come out of the bag ???
2006-08-21 13:59:11 · answer #5 · answered by NeelKontho 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
After they nuke Jerusalem tomorrow 8/22, Israel will retaliate to wipe out most of Iran anyway. We should just hang back and watch.
2006-08-21 11:37:29 · answer #6 · answered by neil r 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not until the Evidence is totally and 100% beyond Doubt - not in any way Fudged or Speculative, but with cast iron certainty,with the evidence being irrefutable.
2006-08-21 11:19:45 · answer #7 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have met many people from Iran and they are good people. The leaders of the country may be a bit balmy but you should not tar everyone with the same brush.
2006-08-21 11:17:15 · answer #8 · answered by Jim 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Theire only reason-current or not-are to be masters in theire own garden.Some kind of evildoers arent the reason thats embarrasing to even point out.
So you say they deserve to be dehumanified?
Wiped out?
There are no winners there since they in fact are your sisters and brothers as well as any humans.
You would end reducing yourself and thats the US path so bye little brothers.Shrinking by the second.
HO HO HO
2006-08-21 11:19:29 · answer #9 · answered by idiotjim 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
heard it said many times, but i for one don't wish to see nukes brought into play always remember what you sow you reap but that's not suggesting that i think Iran is acting responsibly i believe they should adopt a less arrogant attitude and start to get the house in order
2006-08-21 11:21:07 · answer #10 · answered by srracvuee 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋