English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

The difference is that people actually want to see Paris.

2006-08-21 04:11:07 · answer #1 · answered by tweetz 3 · 0 0

Monica. She became reckless, yet i do not get the theory that she's stupid. She's also not a criminal, in spite of Ken Starr's staggering efforts to educate in the different case. And, doubtful in spite of the reality that it would want to were, she does have journey operating interior the federal authorities. and she or he ought to've realized something about authorities from bill Clinton. Paris Hilton? A dumb, vapid, convicted inebriated motive force with a wealthy, effective daddy? Who all started pretending to be non secular even as hardship got here? Been there, carried out that, nevertheless being there and doing that for yet another 12 months and a 1/2!

2016-11-05 07:23:13 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Paris Hilton is at least pretty, even if without a brain. Monica Lewinsky is just sad.

2006-08-21 04:11:55 · answer #3 · answered by Larry 6 · 0 0

you have seen pictures of monica right? and no it hasn't paid off for paris.

2006-08-21 04:11:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Porn isn't every ones "cup of tea". Just because one is somewhat promiscuous doesn't mean they are into porn. And the "almighty $" isn't every ones bottom line.

2006-08-21 04:14:26 · answer #5 · answered by kj 7 · 0 0

Would you really pay to see Miss Piggy in action?

2006-08-21 04:11:56 · answer #6 · answered by jxt299 7 · 0 0

Not sure if you've taken a good look at the two of them.....there's no comparison........contact

2006-08-21 04:13:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers