English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-21 03:20:42 · 10 answers · asked by ALAN B 2 in Education & Reference Trivia

10 answers

oh my stars too funny to give an answer.

2006-08-21 07:40:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What pen??? Yes its absolutely wrong and unnecessary. Research has moved on so much that the only way to move forward is human testing now as we now know so much more about the human system. These barbarians who makes a living out of torturing these poor creatures to death deserve all the grief they get. Imagine your pet being strung up and tortured so it screams until it dies.

2006-08-21 03:29:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I've never seen any animal sweat more than when we took our guinea pig to take the SAT's [snack aptitude test]. Well, I don't think it was sweat because they don't have sweat glands. He did pass with flying colors, being able to tell the difference between rotten tomatoes and fresh ones, which brand of cardboard was best for chewing on and of course, being able to squeak on command.

I don't think many people got the pun in your question ...

2006-08-21 03:49:16 · answer #3 · answered by freak369xxx 3 · 0 0

Animal testing is cruel and should be abolished, like the 11 plus was.

2006-08-21 03:35:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Voice recognition protocols...

and remeber the [in]famous Bulwer-Lytton quote:
"The pen is mightier than the horde"



Or...mayhaps you have it backwards
isn't it the pen that holds the animals????

2006-08-21 06:19:49 · answer #5 · answered by Gemelli2 5 · 0 0

I think with multiple choice questions they can be trained to hit, yes/no... true/false on a keypad with a claw , paw or tail But they need to be tested first to see if they can do it...

2006-08-21 03:42:46 · answer #6 · answered by ragdoll 3 · 0 0

I think it puts them under tremendous pressure. They get easily confused and can't answer the questions. I think that's how it went

2006-08-21 03:30:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

YES very wrong.

2006-08-21 04:04:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

how can it be wrong there wouldn't be any cures for diseases, .

2006-08-24 06:06:14 · answer #9 · answered by pooonmywellies 2 · 0 0

better animals than us ./////////////////////

2006-08-23 01:26:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers