i find the concepts of synchronicity and a collective unconsciousness interesting, as i do believe in a collective consciousness, but i don't think it's exactly the opposite. of course, having an analytical mind, as well as looking for what's "under the surface" i'm probably predisposed to being a "jungian."
2006-08-21 03:25:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think he owned a nice watch. His wife was the daughter of the CEO of IWC (International Watch Company), Johannes Raushenbach-Vogel. Florentine Ariosto Jones founded the firm in 1868, but he soon went bankrupt. Several men took the helm and did no better, but then, Vogel took over and made profits. Naturally, he gave Dr. Carl Gustav Jung a fine watch when he wed Emma Vogel. Other than that, I once loved to read Jung's books. I much prefer him to his teacher Freud. I have changed over the years and read much more, so I am not as awed by Jung as I was when I was a teenager. His opinions about astrology and UFO's are wild, and neither he nor Freud can really interpret dreams. I can think of no one man who has contributed as much as Freud or Jung to their field, but knowledge progresses...slowly or rapidly.
2006-08-21 10:36:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by miyuki & kyojin 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, Jung was one of the founders of what we now think of as the modern psychoanalytic movement, along with Freud, though like Freud, his ideas were not entirely fully formed. His ideas that the unconscious was not only a realm of repressed feelings and desires (like Freud believed) but also had a creative component to it was interesting, in that his analysis of dreams led others to consider interpreting hallucinations, Rohrschach ink blots and other imagery in diagnosing psychoses. However, as with any theory in psychology, his work encompasses only a portion of the field, and you can't rely on him alone.
2006-08-21 10:18:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by theyuks 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dave's one of my best friends. We call him Tall Monkey because he's yellow and extremely tall.
I miss Junk. Haven't seen Jung in a while.
2006-08-21 10:10:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you see some of his ideas daily, though people have no idea they are acting Jungian.
A forefather of modern psychology and clinical social work. Though all of his work might not appear relevant today, you would not have what is relevant today without his advancements.
I personally think it holds up much better than Freud.
2006-08-21 10:36:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Jung is a moron.
2006-08-21 10:05:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I live in small hunt in the Brazilian rainforest and I have no idea who you talk about.
2006-08-22 00:41:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Chad 7
·
1⤊
0⤋