I mean 2 say yesterday's match???(Although i've no interest in pakistan)
2006-08-21 02:37:24 · 14 answers · asked by Z H 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
It was totally unfair...you see people might probably be wondering why ICC arent sacking Hair...well thats because he is their employee plus he is white skinned.........
2006-08-21 09:55:14 · answer #1 · answered by (^_^) 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
am afraid my dear...v r using very polite words for the blooody jerk daryl hair...hes so cruel and evil...he is a black spot on the game...definately he took money for all this....but IC thinks that only the players and specially aisan players can cheat and umpires are angels....huh...but look what IC is doing...and look what ex australian players are saying...it sall recism i am afraid....ICC might ban inzi for 8 matches...for putting the match to an end...but they might overlook what the umpires did..they are seeing the end mo re closely than the means.....it has 2b asked from that blody cheat that whom did u c tempering the ball....and if u dint se anybody then y th hell did u award penalty runs....and even then when u saw paki team not coming outta ground...u shud have gone 2 inzi and told him that well..if u dont come..i will award it 2 englanad...but he didnt do any of the above...coz he never wanted to,,,,he wanted the same what happened.....and sorry 2 comment on simon taufel's comments that he knows the aws better than any1....had that been the caase...he would not have given inzi run out in faisalabad as that was a complete matter of law..............HATE HAIR
2006-08-22 00:06:13 · answer #2 · answered by Zuhair-from-pakistan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Darrell Hair is the biggest loser.Though I dont support th Pak team still the umpire first should have warned them about the tampering and the team also shudnt hav left the field.
2006-08-21 09:48:07 · answer #3 · answered by Amber 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I thought it was quite funny...the way they went off into their room and got mardy when the umpires thought they messed with the balls
And then when they finished sulking and were ready to play, the umpires got mardy and said they were not ready to play
I wouldnt be ready to play either if i was the umpire, coz if someone would question my decision i would be upset too
I think the umpires were only doing their job....and so it WASNT unfair to anyone
mardy = slang word for upset ....are you a fan of Irfan Pathan's? I think he's quite talented myself!
2006-08-21 09:45:24 · answer #4 · answered by Angel_like 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yeah pretty much
I think if inzamam should quit cricket. Because when he got out during Indian match - obstrucing the field, he said they have no spirit, now he has no spirit, he protested against them, and he still is not apologizing. So i think he should be guilty of not maintaing the spirit of cricket and ball tampering.
2006-08-21 21:24:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No it was not..!The ball was not tempered and TV cameras showed that and there was no consultation before that..
History of darrel hair doubts the credibity of his appointment and the credibility of ICC itself..(he is an australian but lives in England)
check out the link i am posting...
2006-08-21 18:41:54 · answer #6 · answered by Ali 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I see you are an Indian. Whatever happens you will always be against Pakistan. Whatever it may be wrong or right.
2006-08-21 18:32:39 · answer #7 · answered by the.chosen.one 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
if Pakistan won the match....i think it wasn't fair. they've beeen cheating since Afridi got in.
2006-08-21 10:24:34 · answer #8 · answered by Krish 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I thought you where talking about 2 pac!
2006-08-21 09:43:24 · answer #9 · answered by hh 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what does tupac have to do with it?
he was murdered by biggie smalls
2006-08-21 09:43:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋