trading Brooks for Kurt Warner--What do you think?
2006-08-21 02:30:32 · 16 answers · asked by TigerLilly 4 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
In a heartbeat!! Warner has two of the best WR in the game and now a stud RB. He will have better stats then Brooks even if Warner gets hurt. And if Warner stays healthy you might just have two top 5 QB's on your hand, whch is great trade bait. Brooks throws way too many INT's and the Raiders have all started bickering already. Make the move ASAP!!!
2006-08-21 02:39:39 · answer #1 · answered by Drunk365 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Heres the thing. Warner is obviously better than Aaron Brooks, but Kurt Warner wont play a full season. He'll play about 10-12 games before he gets hurt. Its not really that big a deal because if he's your backup QB you'll only use him once this season if Palmer can stay healthy.
2006-08-21 10:51:32 · answer #2 · answered by Taylor C 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Warner has much more experience. Take the trade. With Warner you get experience and a lot of passing yards. Arizona has a lot of talented wide recievers (a la Detroit) and that can only mean a good season. I have sources that tell me that the job is Warner's. I also have sources that say that whether rookie Matt Leinart had come to camp immediately or not, the job was still Warner's. The Cardinals head coach Dennis Green doesn't like starting rookies immediately and prefers experience. Brooks isn't that good or accurate of a passer. That trade could really pay off if you take it.
2006-08-21 12:48:51 · answer #3 · answered by zac y 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Do it, Brooks for Warner right now would be a steal...
Brooks and Moss aren't on the same page in Oakland, while Warner is the starter and has two great receivers in Larry Fitzgerald and Anquan Boldin that will help him put up very solid numbers compared to Brooks.
2006-08-21 09:37:24 · answer #4 · answered by panther907 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd say take the trade. Even if Warner plays half the season he would proably still give you better numbers then a full season of Brooks.
2006-08-21 09:38:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Go for it. Brooks hasnt done great in any of his games so far, and if Warner stays healthy he will put up good numbers. Warner also has great players around him.
2006-08-21 09:36:00 · answer #6 · answered by Stargazer 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If it can be done do it. It will take more then Brooks alone. Right now Brooks as the trade value of a one legged track star. Any thing you can do to remoce him from your roster wold be a good move.
2006-08-21 12:13:33 · answer #7 · answered by StoneworkiN 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not yet. warner has more competition then brooks.
Depth Chart-
1.Kurt Warner 2.Matt Leinart. (Cardinals)
2.Aaron Brooks 2.Marques Tuiasosopo.(Raiders)
2006-08-21 10:35:23 · answer #8 · answered by iamawesome 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brooks sucks, but he is going to play all year.
Warner will be a beast...until he gets injured 1/2 way through the season.
2006-08-21 09:36:16 · answer #9 · answered by Judge Smails 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
umm keep brooks... warner isnt even going to start the whole season... brooks can make plays with his feet and oh yea, he has RANDY MOSS
2006-08-21 10:42:19 · answer #10 · answered by Yung Prince 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋