English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I just found these. If you think Bush's new levels of security have done nothing, check these out.

http://www.aina.org/news/20060106102431.htm

http://www.startribune.com/722/story/607918.html
read the left side


http://www.cdi.org/terrorism/chronology.html
Notice how the attacks are not happening anymore to the US

2006-08-21 02:22:59 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

To me, it looks like Bush is doing a fantastic job in the security department

2006-08-21 02:30:32 · update #1

So, did anyone even go to those sites, or are they living on there ignorence some more. I mean even CNN admits it and they are against Bush

2006-08-21 02:33:22 · update #2

12 answers

Attacks are not happening because there is heightened security. Of course, if the New York Times and other eastern liberal rags keep disclosing how terrorist are being tracked, the additional security is being compromised and made ineffective by the liberal agenda. They'd rather see attacks just to discredit Bush. Its like Hezbollah hiding their launchers in populated areas knowing that there will be civilian casualties.

2006-08-21 02:31:38 · answer #1 · answered by williegod 6 · 1 0

Bush will never be able to do enough, the Dems now say he is doing too much , but after the elections will say he has not done enough.

dont be surprised if during the campaigns they say he is not doing enough of the right things while doing to much that is wrong.

2006-08-21 09:43:18 · answer #2 · answered by W E J 4 · 1 0

well yeah....when has bush done anything in the us...why should his security levels be any different from the rest of his presidency

2006-08-21 09:28:09 · answer #3 · answered by Yogaflame 6 · 0 0

well, you can't say they have done NOTHING because these secuirty implemented like in airport doe smake it harder for terrorist to bomb the planes with liquids. but the thing is, Bush Administration's policy toward the mideast is creating more danger than ever before to our country.

2006-08-21 09:29:22 · answer #4 · answered by Man 5 · 1 0

Twenty-one former generals and high ranking national security officials have called on United States President George W. Bush to reverse course and embrace a new area of negotiation with Iran, Iraq, and North Korea. In a letter released Thursday, the group told reporters Bush's 'hard line' policies have undermined national security and made America less safe.Of particular concern for the generals was increased saber rattling between Washington and Tehran over the development of an Iranian nuclear program.


...Ronald Reagan was willing to negotiate with the Soviets even though they were the 'Evil Empire'...one wonders why George Bush can't negotiate with the 'Axis of Evil.'

retired Lt. General Robert Guard
"We call on the administration to engage immediately in direct talks with the government of Iran without preconditions to help resolve the current crisis in the Middle East and to settle differences over an Iranian nuclear program," their letter read.

"An attack on Iran would have disastrous consequences for security in the region and U.S. forces in Iraq," they argued. "It would inflame hatred and violence in the Middle East and among Muslims everywhere."

In a telephone news conference Thursday morning, the former security officials took particular aim at the Bush Administration's policy of refusing to negotiate with terrorists or with states that support them.

"That seems strange since Ronald Reagan was willing to negotiate with the Soviets even though they were the 'Evil Empire," said retired Lt. General Robert Guard, who served as special assistant to Defense Secretary Robert McNamara during the Vietnam War and now works at the non-profit Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation. "One wonders why George Bush can't negotiate with the Axis of Evil."

The generals further argued that the Bush Administration's invasion of Iraq is at least partially responsible for Iran's drive to develop a nuclear program.

"When you announce an axis of evil of three countries and invade one and then say that Iran should take that as a lesson, it does seem that it may give them an incentive to do precisely what they don't want them to do," Guard said, "develop a nuclear weapon."

Former director of Policy Planning for the State Department, Morton Halperin, said the same goes for North Korea. The more belligerent the Bush Administration behaves, he said, the faster North Korea will work to develop nuclear weapons.

"The North Koreans want to talk to us directly," said Halperin, who now works for the Washington, DC-based Center for American Progress. "Their concern is about getting security assurances from us and about getting diplomatic recognition. We should not be afraid to talk to our opponents.""Until we get away from the idea that we can solve these problems through the use of military force and begin to change the political problems causing discontent by providing security and services, we're not going to win this war," BUSH DOES NOT WANT PEACE AND WE ARE NO SAFER< HE ONLY MAKES THINGS WORSE !!!

2006-08-21 09:34:23 · answer #5 · answered by jdfnv 5 · 0 2

The security levels have never meant anything it's just another excuse to use the taxpayers money.

2006-08-21 09:29:20 · answer #6 · answered by couchP56 6 · 0 2

Like Brad Pitt's character said in "Fight Club"
It is the illusion of safety.

2006-08-21 09:29:57 · answer #7 · answered by reachdan 2 · 0 1

those thing are not even working
bush is worthless
just because people arnt attacking the us now doesnt mean it wont later

2006-08-21 09:29:28 · answer #8 · answered by kay2angel 4 · 0 2

No I think they are fine

2006-08-21 09:28:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

got that right

2006-08-21 09:27:25 · answer #10 · answered by Hooch 1 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers