English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

18 answers

I'm voting for david cameron, brown has too many teeth.

2006-08-21 01:42:01 · answer #1 · answered by HOPE 4 THE FUTURE: 5 · 0 1

Of course Gordon will make a better PM than David 'what do I stand for' Cameroon. Gordon will be a great leader.

2006-08-22 21:37:55 · answer #2 · answered by paul1953uk 3 · 0 0

Faced with a choice between the longest-serving Chancellor of the Exchequer (a man with experience of government at cabinet level) who as Chancellor has brought the nation economic stability and a near record-breaking period of continuous economic growth OR a person with no track record of being in power and a shadow chancellor who was the the economic advisor to the Treasury in the period that led to Black Wednesday, I think I'll go with Gordon Brown.

Every time I see David Cameron on a bicycle I'm reminded of Norman Tebbit's advice to the unemployed in the North of England (at a time of 3 million unemployment under a Conservative government) to "get on your bike" and find a job in the South of England. Caring Conservatism has a lot more hearts and minds to win over before Cameron will see the inside of number ten I believe. Some of us have memories of what Mr Cameron's party did to the country before Dr Brown became its Chancellor. (For those who were too young to experience it, the successive Conservative governments prior to 1997 brought the country 3 million unemployed, the base rate in double figures, Sterling crashing out of the Exchange Rate Mechanism, record number of house reposessions, a failing NHS and 'cash for questions' in the house of commons. Oh, and let's not forget a Prime Minister who headed a campaign for a "return to family values" having an affair with a Member of his own Parliament).

2006-08-21 04:34:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The real question is will either of them make a good prime minister?

I would like the new prime minister to be a member of the Labour Party. Not, you may note, of "New" Labour.

Bring back clause 4.

2006-08-21 02:09:15 · answer #4 · answered by Pema 2 · 0 0

Gordon's age, ability and proved record makes him a better man for the job.
The problem with David Cameroon is as it shows in your question, his surname doesn't warrant a capital letter.
"Daddy Dave"

2006-08-21 01:44:12 · answer #5 · answered by Daddy Dave 3 · 1 0

Definitely

2006-08-21 02:37:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

David Cameron is like Tony Blair; all styles and presentation but no substance. Cameron will outpoodle tony blair abd lick Dubyas *** into the bargain.

2006-08-21 01:44:11 · answer #7 · answered by olayinka o 3 · 1 0

I can't help being suspicious of David Cameron. Either he joined the wrong party or being very sneaky. Saying that, I just never want to see the tories in power.

2006-08-21 01:40:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

in my opinion, definite. i'm happy he's PM. i'm 17 and couldn't vote.. yet my dad earns 47k a three hundred and sixty 5 days and he's ill of being taxed extortionately should you're able to artwork yet sit down on their **** rather. He informed me his happiest days were at the same time as Margaret Thatcher became in skill, it quite is a uncommon aspect to hearken to, yet even she had to address Labour's mess that they left for her. those who're adversarial to Cameron are basically out to declare all they could (which, embarrassingly is maximum of england)

2016-11-26 21:10:24 · answer #9 · answered by freije 4 · 0 0

If I was asked to describe a lying,cheating a*sehole I think Brown the Stealth Tax merchant would be the winner.Watch how he makes himself invisible when awkward questions are being asked.

2006-08-23 05:35:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i don't think it'll make much difference cos they are both neo-libs with a liking for the American way of doing things.neither truly cares about the environment or the working class even if that is what they pretend to do and both will encourage private interests in public services and continue with the make believe of the war on terror (you can't declare war on a noun)

2006-08-21 02:51:29 · answer #11 · answered by che 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers