If Bradman was playing modern day test and O.D.I, who would be a beta batsmen him or Tendulkar?

Question

Tell me who u think is beta and y

Answer 1

I wish i could report you for posting this question(spreading false information)lol
Batting in those dayus was difficult but wait a second
Tendulkar is a hopeless bastman anyway..
Remember when he go hit by shoaib on the head in karachi and walked off without waiting for umpire's decision in the next over when usually they are willing to accept any "cheat"from the umpires?He is not even the best bastman in the world..and you are comparing him with GREAT Bradman?Who was one of pioneers of the game?'
He is a pahtetic bastsman,..He is overrated..may be an average bastman
Sachin is a hopeless player who sinks indian team to score runs against weak teams on flat pitches..

Answer 2

Bradman without any doubts. He is simply a freak and in a class of his own. It is hard to imagine there will ever be another player in the same league. Although it is difficult to make comparisons across eras, the first answerer's assertions that there was no swing bowling, and bowlers were slower is just incorrect. Swing bowling did exist, and some bowlers were exceptionally good at it, even more so that today. Bowlers like Lindwall, Miller, Larwood and Truemen were deadly fast.
One ofthe true testaments of Bradman's skill was the fact that although England's bodyline tactics did lower his batting average of 99.94, the impossibility of scoring with a ring of fielders behind tothe leg side and sharp bouncers constantly delivered at the head and body, he still managed an average of 56.57 - something plenty of modern batsmen dream of! In the face of bodyline - Sachin would struggle. He doesn't like short pitched bowling as it is, let alone with a field like bodyline set.
As for ODI it is really impossible to say, as he never had to adopt the types of tactics used in the ODI arena.
Bradman's strike rate of 68 isn't as high as guys like Gilchrist, but it was rare to need to score at such a high rate in tests, so it was remarkable anyway. He also scored an average of 134 runs per test match - way ahead of anyone else, and at an average of 1 century every three innings! He also scored 25% of all of Australia's runs on average out of the games he played! Incredible! Even Lara and Tendulkar dont go above 20% of team contribution. It should also be pointed out that Bradman made his 6996 runs in only 52 matches, and the part of his career where he would have been expected to be in his prime, cricket was suspended and he served his country and the empire in War.
Tendulkar, although fourth on the overall runs scored list, and a truely great player, has scored less than double the runs in nearly three times as many tests.

Answer 3

Well,Somebody ask this question when he don't know about cricket at all.
Don't compare,Don Bredman without a doubt.

The time bredman used to play there were more swing bowler and they were the fastest people and they used to swing the ball with higher speed.Pitch cover is not used to in game so every morning pitch had a lot of swing and uneven bounce.The time of body line series also.Bredman average was above 55 what is equal to other great player.
For your kind information,Unofficially fastest hundred record comes on the name of Bredman in first class on 27ball only.And these are 8 ball over.

Don't compare,The average difference between tendulkar and bredman average is almost near to V.V.S.Laxman career average what is near to 42 and remember it is a very good average in test matches till this time

Answer 4

I have not seen too many matches of Austrilia or Bradman. But how much I have heard about Bradman is good things. But the best player I like is Sachin and still I like him. After he retirement only I will choose anyone else. You see he is so cute. We don't feel like hurting him.

Answer 5

The answer is Bradman.Bradman is the best ever.Sachin is at par with Viv Richards & Gary Sobers.These three are in a class of their own just below Sir Bradman.

Answer 6

Bradman is the best batsman ever everybody knows that.
He was also very fast he is the only player to score a triple century in a single day.

Answer 7

let me tell u something about bradman. back in the 1930's there was no swing, which would make batting much more easier. also cricket was fairly new so bowlers couldn't bowl that fast either. bradman did not play any ODI matches either.

sachin however stated playing cricket when swing was intoduced. he has faced the fastest bowlers- shoaib akhtar -best spinn bowler - shane warne and has dominated them. he has 11 odi centuries against aus the best team in the world.

so i think to sum up bradman would not be better than sachin

Answer 8

anyone who thinks sachin should be ready to be screwed by ghost of a certain Mr.Larwood,yes his best known foe.how can one think......Mr.Hardy the mathematician started the Bradman scale to measure perfection.why compare rakhi sawant to nargis .for those cracks remember -
*bradman avg.99.96 while the next best man avg.60+
*if bowling was such lolly were hammond &hutton playingin
mars and known as gr8
*if ODI is cricket ray would not be considered gr8 for not making films like MURDER.
IF YOU THINK SACHIN THEN PROBABLY BOOST IS THE SECRET OF YOUR ENERGY

Answer 9

obviously bradman would be the best and best.

why????

because he was the best player when he used to play and have you his average??

69.99 in test cricket.. who can score that much in test

tendulkar takes test cricket as normal

Answer 10

bradman without a doubt.Tendulchar is good,however, until he has a test average of 99.94[bradmans] he will never be in the same league