Is Osama Bin Ladin really a terrorist or an american creation gone wrong?

Question

Osama is the creation of the US government just like saddam hussein. I beleive his main purpose was to get rid or remove kings from saudi arabia and introduce "american democracy" in the kindom. The americans trained Osama and armed him. But something went wrong!!!! and Osama turned against them. If you play with fire you are bound to get burned. America wanted Osama to oppose/change by any means necessary' the saudi system of governance and labelled this as legal. As soon as Osama opposed them with their training and weapons they label him a terrorist? Why? They want to install "puppet democracies in all the countries in the world". Sorry will never happen. They want to play god with the life of citizens of other nations. They armed and trained saddams army so that Iran could be destroyed but this did not happen. Any supprises that there is no love lost between the two countries. One day isreal will turn against america and that day is not too far then we shall see what happens.

Answer 1

And who do you think trained Bin Laden? George H.W. Bush and Reagan. Who went into business with the Bin Ladens? George W. Bush. And who said Bin Laden was a C.I.A agent? Oliver North. Gotta love conservatives.

Check this out.http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=3710767957407328313&q=label%3Aterrorism

Answer 2

WHO IS BIN LADEN, ACTUALLY?

According to the Times, bin Laden et al were CIA employees, given the best training, arms, facilities, and lots of cash for many years. That's what the Times reported on August 24, 1998.

In other articles during the same period, the Times reported that bin Laden is a deadly enemy of the U.S. The Times skips over this amazing change lightly in a couple of articles, commenting that the relationship changed, without asking too many questions. In other words, once again, the government line is accepted as self evident.

Should we believe that the transformation from employee to enemy has really taken place? Is bin Laden an enemy in fact, or is he, like so much else that comes out of the White House, an enemy in fiction?

Remember that during the 80s our leaders swore bin Laden and friends were good guys: "resistance fighters." Wasn't that a lie? If the government was lying about them then, why couldn't it be lying about them now?

Let's do a little imagining. Let's imagine that bin Laden et al are still CIA employees. Could it be that the missile attack was not intended to destroy bin Laden or his supporters? Could it be the attack was intended to build respect for bin Laden among Muslims who oppose the U.S. government? To lend him credibility as a serious opponent of U.S. domination? Is his new job to siphon Arab anger into regressive Fundamentalist movements and thereby destabilize secular Muslim societies which might resist U.S. control? After all, Islamic Fundamentalists have proven themselves the most effective enemies of independent-minded governments. This is precisely why the U.S. created an Islamic Fundamentalist proxy army in Afghanistan in the first place. And there is evidence the CIA is doing the same thing today in Algeria - covertly supporting a jihad (Islamic holy war) aimed at disrupting a secular Muslim society not under U.S. control.

And/or is bin Laden's new assignment perhaps to be a bogey-man of convenience whom the U.S. government can link to any government it wishes to bomb?

Does this sound crazy? Maybe it does at that, but is it any crazier than the admitted fact that the U.S. gave these vicious terrorists more than $6 billion in the first place? Could it be that the lunatics are indeed in control of the asylum?

Six BILLION dollars in 1980s money. How much is that in today's money? Ten billion? Just think. Instead of turning Afghanistan into a living hell they could have cured cancer.

Answer 3

You are right on target but unfortunately no one will hear you.
International politics is and has been a dirty game with only the power brokers winning at the expense of local populations who dont matter to these cold -hearted cash sniffing bastards.
So called terrorism is a reaction to deepseated and too much prolonged suffering - a cry to say we cant take it anymore. Something must be done to stop ignoring the people of the world and do something to change their condition is the message.
When a rat is backed up into a corner it will attack.

Answer 4

He is a creation of the CIA in the early 80's when the Afghans were fighting the Russians. Hs Mujahedeen were armed by the CIA. Now he is a terrorist who has turned against his benefactors much like a mad dog that attacks his masters.

Answer 5

The big question in my mind is who is he working for. Right now corporate America needs Osama a hell of a lot more than Islam does.

Answer 6

He's an American creation, He is serving his purpose. He hasn't gone wrong, he has just done really well.

We are losing our rights aren't we? The governments getting untold funding for war and military contractors aren't they? Isn't the government starting to get everything it could ever hope for?

Answer 7

May be you are right.
But I personally believe that Osama was an American creation & is still under their command & is doing exactly what he is asked to do.

Answer 8

He's an American creation doing exactly what he's suppose to be doing

Answer 9

Could all have been a diversion to sneak Mexicans across the boarder ...

Answer 10

He's a Saudi creation gone wrong.