WHY AM I PRO -ABORTION and PRO CHOICE ???

Question

#1 in modern life, family rearing is based partly on socio- economic factors and in many cases, women get pregnant and can't afford to raise a child. Rather than raise that child in poverty and misery, I feel it should be aborted if the woman chooses.

#2 Some Women are raped and get pregnant. The last thing I'd want is the child of a rapist - someone who has humiliated me - I would never bring a child into the world and have to tell it the truth of its conception.

#3 FETUSES ARE NOT BABY's.
Regardless what these idiot right wingers say, FETUSES CAN'T FEEL PAIN simply because the BRAIN has not developed PAIN CENTERS YET. Research the development of the Cerebrum/Cerrabellum.

#4 I am not bringing any physically/mentally deformed children into the world. I'll save them the humiliation and problems faced by handicapped people.

#5 Women have the right to do WHAT THEY WANT with their body and noone has the right to stop them. NO NEOCON and NO Christian RIGHT WING IDIOTS.

Answer 1

#1 TRUE

#2 I would not want a rape baby either. Of course, the Judds dd get famous despite this though.

#3 very true. Fetuses can't feel pain before their brain is developed.

#4 god point

#5 NEOCONS SUCK. I wish one of them would get in my face and try and tell me what to do with myself. Thats an *** KICKING

Answer 2

First of all, the "fetus" has a heart beat 12 days after conception, that heartbeat does NOT mimic the mother's there fore it is its own body, if you don't want to have children then OK, good for you its your choice, DON'T GET PREGNANT, abortion is NOT a form of birth-control. If you are truly not prepared for children then be responsible and PREVENT IT! By the way, the way that you have formed this "question" in fact makes it the opposite if such. Basically you are writing this to "tell everyone how you feel" and quite frankly its ridiculous. You nor anyone else can determine what another person feels so until YOU are the one in there getting aborted, i would not trust science. Just because someone isn't "perfect" by today's standards doesn't give ANYONE the right to take their life, that's basically what Hitler did! And last but not least if you are so selfish as to assume that you (the woman) is the only decision maker regarding a child then I'm sorry honey but you are VERY mistaken, there is another part to the equation, its called the father! HE MATTERS TOO. This world does NOT I repeat does NOT revolve around you for any reason whatsoever. Get over yourself and off your a** and be a grown up for a change.

As far as abortions in the case of rape and the health of the mother THEN and ONLY then is it a choice!

Answer 3

#1: Poverty is never an excuse for murder. Killing is never kind.

#2: The rape is not the baby's fault and he or she should not be punished by death for the crime of his or her father. People who are conceived in rape are not less worthy of life than the rest of us! Furthermore, abortion only increases the trauma of a woman who has been raped, because SHE becomes the aggressor, hurting another innocent victim the way she was hurt. See:

http://www.deathroe.com/Pro-life_Answers/Answers.cfm?ID=31
http://www.afterabortion.info/Victims/index.htm
http://www.family.org/fofmag/sl/a0039249.cfm
http://www.afterabortion.info/PAR/V2/n1/RAPESUM.htm

#3: The average age of an aborted child in America is 10 weeks. By that age, the baby has a beating heart, recordable brain waves, tiny fingers and toes, and all her organs. She can suck her thumb, grasp an object places in her palm, and FEEL PAIN. See:

http://www.advocatesfortheinnocent.com/fetalpain.html
http://www.justthefacts.org/clar.asp
http://www.abort73.com/HTML/I-A-2-prenatal.html
http://www.studentsforlife.uct.ac.za/foetal%20dev%20photos.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/3847319.stm
http://www.lifeissues.org/ultrasound/11weeks.htm

Here are some photos and video of aborted babies, beginning at 7 weeks (the earliest most abortions are committed):

http://www.cbrinfo.org/Resources/pictures.html
http://www.abort73.com/HTML/I-A-4-video.html

#4: When you meet a handicapped person, do you say, "Wow, I'm so sorry you weren't aborted! You must wish you were dead!" You need to check out:

http://www.notdeadyet.org/

#5: The baby is NOT part of the woman's body. He or she is lives IN the woman's body for a time. I am not a neo-con. I am not right-wing. I am against abortion without exception.

Answer 4

Im indecisive on this issue but...

1. if having a baby is a burden, dont go having sex.

2. This is not a women's choice that they get raped. So I agree, under certain conditions, women have the right to abort.

3. Agree

4. Where is the line drawn for dissability? If parents felt that a tall, muscular, genius had to be born in order to survive in society, would a baby thats tall, muscular but had a smaller brain than the rest be considered a dissability?

5. Then ill bring up the issue that the baby doesnt deserve to have no say in his own destiny. Whether a baby can feel pain or not, it is still life. yes, everytime we wash our hands and everytime we rub our skin, we destory cells that is also life. But they do not have the potential to grow into a baby; as a liberal on a lot of issues, i feel that the issue isnt quite whether the baby can be aborted but rather, should the women recklessly take their reproductive capabilities for granted.

Imma tired, email me if you want to hear more points some more. But again, this is a debatable issue for me.

Answer 5

If you say a woman has the right to do what they want with their bodies, well I disagree. When you are pregnant, you are not just one body anymore. I believe that if the doctor finds the health of the mother in danger then they would do a therapeutic abortion. That is the only way I believe a woman should be able to abort a baby. They have done research on the baby feeling pain and they think it's true. Who knows. But a baby is a gift from God no matter. Woman who do not want to have babies should have their tubes tied or if they will eventually want a baby there are many ways of birth control. Education is the answer as usual.

Answer 6

My first reaction is that his is a very difficult issue. I sympathise with the view that says late abortions are a bad idea. I have heard of cases where junior doctors have left the operating theatre to be sick after watching a foetus being pulled out of its mother in pieces (an arm, then a leg, etc.). I think that it is amazing what human beings can get used to and take for granted if some other weirdo says that it has to be done. So I don't like the ideas of late abortions. If we really are talking about terminating the life of an embrio and not a foetus, then I personally don't have a problem with abortion. But when does an embrio become a foetus? I think that this question should be answered by people who have experience of making intelligent decisions where ethics are involved. And, if we get it a little bit wrong sometimes, then I think that as long as we learn from every mistake, then we should put it down to experience and move on.

And I agree that the mother should decide whether to have an abortion or not provided that it is not a late abortion. Perhaps late abortions should only be allowed on medical grounds, But who should decide whether we should be allowed to terminate a disabled foetus? I think that we need a national debate on this one. I personally have no problems terminating a disabled foetus if it is likely that its quality of life would be unacceptably low. Now I know that human beings have an enormous capacity for putting on a brave face and coping with overwhelming problems whilst continuing to smile. But this does not make it wrong to terminate such lives in the womb if we feel that there is good reason for doing so. And I can say all of these things because although each individual life is important to me, I do not regard life as sacred. In fact, I think that it is highly undesirable and dangerous to label anything as sacred. I can see why people who value their own lives might want to make human life sacred, but I don't think that these people should be listened to. Perhaps the more dificult decisions should be made jointly between the mother and the medical team. But, if there is disagreement, then who should make the final ruling? I don't like the idea of this sort of matter being dealt with by the courts. I think that arbitration experts should be used. And, although I don't feel entirely comfortable with the concept that the mother should decide because it is her body, I think that it makes sense to give plenty of consideration to someone who is going to have to live with the consequences of whatever decision is made.

The other factor that I would like to mention is that in the bad old days women who had babies out of wedlock were stigmatised and even ostracised. A powerful reason for back-street abortion. But these days it's relatively okay to be an individual and nobody has to conform if they don't want to. So, these days, there is no more stigmatisation and no more being ostracised. So, why not encourage those women who are receptive to the idea of adoption to go through with the pregnancy? I believe that there is a demand for the adoption of babies. Is this true? Would presenting adoption as a positive alternative to abortion be a good idea?

Martin Camden.

[e-mail]

Answer 7

Ho hum...I frankly am pro-choice...but you, my dear, are an idiot. You make a mockery of what a woman's right to choose is all about.
You are making this a political issue...which it's not, it's a woman's issue. So frankly, you're whole little excel jesus on this issue is moot.
And it's pain receptors...not pain centers; which frankly proves your ignorance on this topic.
You need to stop looking at abortion through the prism of modern feminism. You need to look at through the prism of being a woman and not trying to prove a point. You frankly sound like a shrew and you're illogical. Oh, and you do know what neocon means don't you? That means a person who is a Zionist a.k.a. a Jew.
You put a bad name on women and women who are pro-choice...like me who is a Conservative Federalist. *sigh* It's so sad to see what feminism has become...very, very sad. One day you're going to have to open your eyes honey...and see what it means to be a WOMAN, not a simpering, whining, shrew that preys on your own ignorance.

Answer 8

·1.- A lot of latinoamerican families has a lot of kids and they are poor and happy with their kids.
.2.- The kid is inocent. castrate the father.
.3.- Fetuses are babies.
.4.- After that , you will start to kill the uglies, the drunkers, the fats and minories. Just to have a nice beaty people ?
.5.- the women could use condom to aboid that 'problem'

You do not like life.

Answer 9

what i think is this....that as women we want to have a choice because we are the ones that carry the baby, but we are the only ones that can really take the choice away from the baby. so when we hear about situations like rape and incest we feel that women should really have a choice to abort her baby, but when women use abortions for birth control we feel that those women really did have other choices and should not have the choice to have an abortion.

Answer 10

3# If it's heart is beating or it's brain is active it IS alive and thus is protected by human rights.

However, since an egg and a sperm cell do not become a functional heart and brain over night, abortion should be legal up until one starts working.

Being pro-abortion is disgusting. I hate abortion, If there is a god im sure people who get abortions (Even the ones I think should be legal) are going to hell right behind the murderers and right before the rapists.

Pro-choice is one thing, but lobbying for people to get abortions actively is like being pro-murder in my mind.

Abortion will always be murder to me, but the law should not see through the eyes of man, but the eyes of logic.