Does anyone(besides me) think that the whole AIDS epidemic was really a government experiment gone wrong? Maybe they were going to use it as biological warfare and it just got out of hand.
2006-08-20 18:10:35 · 24 answers · asked by ... 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
perhaps it might be a conspiracy, but if it was going to be used for warfare it isn't very effective. death takes years although once infected the resources to keep this person alive are taxed so in a drawn out conflict it would have some use...
2006-08-21 13:04:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, I tend to disagree marginally.
It was a government experiment that went RIGHT on the part of perpetrators.
CNN or PBS had a show many years ago on the south african bioweapons laboratory where such germ warfare work was going on. Early 70s US and British authorities shut it down after the AIDS fall out.
The AIDS was known to have surfaced in Congo SubSahara region. The people present at that time include Frank Carlucci, David Lowenstein, former CIA operatives. Carlucci was also present at the Guangdong province in China where SARS break out happened. He was also the former head of Carlyle group that specializes in investing in bio companies that discover antidotes to bioweapons.
Also search google with "Rumsfeld, Swine flu". Rumsfeld, a college mate of Carlucci, made it out like a bandit in 1975 when a military cadet was diagonised with "swine flu" three months after Rumsfeld got power in Ford Admin. Rumsfeld crusaded to vaccinate 30M americans with an experimental vaccine that killed over 200 people. Rumsfeld made a big fortunte. Several years later, Rumsfeld again comes to power and the cousin of Swine Flu became "Avian Bronchitis virus" and then "SARS" and now "Bird Flu". Again, Rumsfeld is expected to gain at least $6 billion through his stake on "Tamiflu", the vaccine for birdflu.
Coincidences of these type don't happen in nature.
2006-08-21 01:22:08 · answer #2 · answered by interstate_101 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
let me see, I read this once.
Oh yeah, the super wealthy and influential wanted something that would drastically reduce world population in the event food became real scarce.
Problem is aids was taking too long to wipe out large numbers or people so they had to go back to the drawing board. And some clown worked up medication that kept people alive.
Enter the latest Anthrax test. OOOpps didn't work. Too hard to spread to a large body of victims.
Maybe we can mutate bird flu....... WOO HOO
2006-08-21 01:29:45 · answer #3 · answered by Harley Charley 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, i think you are pretty much alone on that theory. the AIDS epidemic really is an epidemic. i'm not a big government person either, but AIDS doesn't seem like a federal plot undermining biological warfare.
2006-08-21 01:16:34 · answer #4 · answered by Em 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
wow that is quite a conspiracy theory. i think this one is even more interstesting than the we-never-landed-on-the-moon one. but no i dont beieve it. how could it be biological warfare if it is passed through bodily fluids (were they going to shoot everybody up with infected sperm???)? its not transferable like a flu would be and it doesnt do anything like radiation. it also takes years or decades for a person to die of AIDS so its not very efficient.
however if you have any evidence to support your theory i would love to hear it. this is a very interesting topic.
2006-08-21 01:19:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps, but my opiinion on ANY government conspiracy is that government is not clever enough to keep secrets, especially one with such wide ranging morale inplications....people feel guilty and leak information to punish the guilty...and that hasn;t happened.
What really happened is suggested as someone in Africa got frisky with a monkey that was diseased and the virus mutated in a human host. That seems more likely.
2006-08-21 01:19:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
... and the 9/11 terrorist attacks were actually inside jobs where the bombs imploded from within the WTC buildings and the Pentagon, right? And that the atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were actualy high explosives spread by a series of bomb runs within a span of 12 hours...
2006-08-21 01:20:25 · answer #7 · answered by Bummerang 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
experiment for what purpose? bs to population control, there are enough diseases and other things that affect population numbers. if they were going to use it for warfare then they would have tested in such a way that it didn't spread all over the globe.
do you also believe that we never landed on the moon?
2006-08-21 01:17:51 · answer #8 · answered by pacinofan11 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't think so. From what I've seen it was a natural disease that existed in an isolated region of Africa and got spread around the world by modern transportation. Sad case.
2006-08-21 01:15:49 · answer #9 · answered by jxt299 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
it's a given that anything is possible. Do I REALLY believe it I'd have to say no, but I wouldn't be surprised if it did happen that way. the view's great from up here on the fence, btw! big smile
2006-08-21 01:27:04 · answer #10 · answered by albany 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋