why was there no wreckage, why was the hole so small, why did the fire go out so quickly.
2006-08-20 18:03:00 · 15 answers · asked by mig_killing_pigs 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
ok slow down with the insults. i am only trying to learn here not start a storm.
but the hole was only 80 feet wide. the wingspan of a 757 is over 200 feet accross.
10,000 gallons of jet fuel can and will burn for days not hours.
i am looking for someone to give me a website that can give me some positive proof evidence. I am hoping and praying that i am wrong in my thought patterns. please help me.
2006-08-20 18:20:10 · update #1
as for the wreckage the hole is the same size as the feusalage. where are the wings? there should be chunks of metal and debris for hundreds of feet.
2006-08-20 18:22:55 · update #2
Yes, I felt the concussion when the plane hit the Pentagon, there was a massive fire from a large section of the building that
the plane crashed into, and more than 100 people lost their lives. The fire did not go out quickly, but there were many people on the scene who helped rescue others. There was tremendous wreckage....
2006-08-20 18:10:37 · answer #1 · answered by AFL lover 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There are lots of way to explain what happened.
The hole being so small: The plane was made of aluminum, the pentagon, steel reinforced concrete. It's basic physics that only the places where the majority of the energy went would cause serious damage...In this case, it was the front of the plane.
However, I could not explain the unbroken windows for you...
The jet fuel- People were working to put it out. Since it was ground level and surrounded mostly by steel and concrete, it would not of been that hard to put it out. Although i am a little curious why they were using water (look at the pictures) to put out a gas fire...
There was some wreckage, although the placement of it and how it all looked did not seem to support the official story to me. But it's entirely possible that the wreckage randomly spread apart without becoming burnt or the paint getting scratched off, It was a high speed crash and burn damage takes time.
A couple of notes however.
The depth that the plane penetrated does NOT support the idea that I laid forth up here, that is to say that apparently a hollow piece of aluminum traveling at 520 miles per hour, was able to penetrate through literally feet of concrete, that was reinforced with steel. Seems a little odd to me.
2006-08-21 01:27:07 · answer #2 · answered by cat_Rett_98 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dear, please do a little research. The hole wasn't so small and the fire may have gone out a little quicker because we had firemen who were about to get there in time to keep it from spreading. Over 150 people died.There WAS a wreckage. It's not there anymore because we've rebuild. You are the first revisionist I've ever encountered for a major tragedy this close to history dates. There were ultimately four plan crashes. One in the Pentagon, two in the world trade center, and the fourth, USA flight 93 slammed into the rural grounds as a result of the passengers attempts to retake the plane.
2006-08-21 01:13:09 · answer #3 · answered by sacredmud 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you freaking serious???!!! People died there!!! How about a little respect for the innocent lives lost. But there was wreckage, the hole was not small......The Penatagon is a huge strcuture, the hole looked small. and the fire went out because the Pentagon structure is mostly stone and concrete!!
2006-08-21 01:11:19 · answer #4 · answered by BAWAGS 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The wreckage wasn't that small and there was quite a bit of damage. Yes, a plane hit the pentagon
2006-08-21 01:10:13 · answer #5 · answered by stashboxfull 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have too agree with you, i have seen no proof positive anything to convince me a plane crashed into the pentagon. In fact I have only see just the opposite! Funny how the grass just outside that hole in the pentagon was left pretty green and un touched.hmm.
2006-08-21 01:32:44 · answer #6 · answered by hlizzy21 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the inbred moron god is not real doesn't understand that if it's not an act of god, it's a conspiracy. And don't worry your not helping any terrorist's. I don't think Al-Qaeda is saying to themselves "hey some lady just said that the Pentagon wasn't hit by an airliner, that has helped us so much that now we can blow up Chicago.
If the Pentagon was hit by terrorist's then they conspired to do it right. No matter what happened 9/11 was a conspiracy by definition. So when people laugh at conspiracy theorist's they must be laughing at what our government tells us. If I'm correct Uncle Sam said it was an airliner that was hijacked. Well then that is a conspiracy. And if people say it was an airliner then being that in itself is a conspiracy, then people who say it was an airliner that hit the Pentagon, they by definition must be conspiracy theorists.
2006-08-21 01:18:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Watch Loose Change Edition II on google video... and read the debate around the whole event and history of self sabotage to provide provocation for war in US and make your own opinion. I for one am not yet sure they did it themselves... But i certaily do not rule it out given the way the attack has been cashed upon and given the long history USA has had of such tactics in promoting war.
One needs to self educate in order to escape influence of state and corporate controlled media.
2006-08-21 02:46:54 · answer #8 · answered by boogie man 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/ - this site has some interesting theories about your question - Only the NEOCONS can answer you for sure, but based on the physical evidence presented, it makes it hard to swallow the explanation of a jetliner doing that damage. Check the links below for more 9/11 info...
2006-08-21 01:17:50 · answer #9 · answered by gonzos_doctor 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes a plane crashed at the Pentagon. Wondering why you are asking...everyone knows about it.
2006-08-21 01:13:48 · answer #10 · answered by Lore 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋