English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

and things in Iraq were exactly like they are now, do you think conservatives would still be so optimistic about its future?

2006-08-20 17:48:58 · 25 answers · asked by Steve 6 in Politics & Government Politics

25 answers

No, they are robots who think everything Limbaugh tells them to think and he would be telling them the war was bad because a Democrat was in charge. Conservatives are incapable of thinking for themselves, they just repeat slogans.

2006-08-20 17:53:18 · answer #1 · answered by jxt299 7 · 4 2

Are you kidding? Kerry could have won, we could have not had 9/11, the whole country could have zero unemployment, gasoline could be .02 a gallon and the conservations would be screaming their head off about how bad things are. On the other hand, if Kerry would have won and we were in the shape we are in today, they would have hung him from the highest tree in DC a long time ago.

Before you other posters start jumping on me, I didn't say 9/11 wouldn't have happened if Kerry were president, I was making a point that every thing could have been a bowl of cherries without the slightest problem during Kerry's term, and they would have still been crying about all the problems.

2006-08-21 01:00:04 · answer #2 · answered by historybug 4 · 3 1

If Gore had won in 2000, we'd have been talking about economic sanctions against Afghanistan after 9/11. We dodged a bullet.
We dodged another bullet when Kerry lost in 2004. Aside from the fact that he's indecisive, he's also an admitted war criminal, circa Vietnam. He said it.
Bush's only mistake (as it is America's mistake), is paying attention to world opinion, playing by these so called 'rules of war' while the enemy doesn't, and in not invading Iran. Which has to happen eventually.
I don't care what the rest of the planet thinks of America (who are they to criticize us, we subsidize most of it), but after 9/11 we owe no one any explanation for any action we take in defense of this country.

2006-08-21 01:07:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

I don't know, I think Bush terrified everyone into voting for him making them think that he was actually going to do something over in Iraq, come to find out he hasn't done anything right, if I was president I would have pulled our troops out and carpet bombed tthe whold damn country a long time ago. I just hope that we have better choices to choose from next election. I hope Hilarly and Jed don't run

2006-08-21 01:01:12 · answer #4 · answered by Tammy C 3 · 0 0

No. They would already have called for his impeachment. They never would have stood for the senseless killing of our own on foreign soil without creating an uproar. However, since Kerry didn't win, and we have a puppet at the helm with daddy Bush as puppeteer anything goes. We the people have no more rights and no more voice, our phones and computers are tapped . . . oops, gotta go, they're knocking . . .

2006-08-21 01:04:29 · answer #5 · answered by ☠Naz☠ 6 · 2 0

we wouldn't be in war i believe and I think the conservatives would be optimistic about the future. No one really knows whats going on with America.

2006-08-21 00:55:01 · answer #6 · answered by Ursula 2 · 1 1

i don't things would be how they are right now. I think kerry who has fought before in vietnam wouldn't have invaded Iraq. He would be smarter I think. Maybe not though.

2006-08-21 00:58:33 · answer #7 · answered by one glove 3 · 0 0

no...and MANY conservatives are not very optimistic about the future...they may try to be but it's obviously not perfect yet nor will it be in the future...boy am i sure glad kerry didn't win though! that is an even more scary thought! (and i wouldn't consider myself a 'conservative')

2006-08-21 00:53:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anna 4 · 1 2

he would sealed the borders -like he said, and drawn down the troops, gotten serious about rebuilding infrastructure, which Bush has never done these things- we wouldn't have mercenaries without laws free to pillage, while military makes our slice of news to keep the US from suspecting how bad it really is- and things would be much quieter and better off, a lot less dead, injured, traumatised Americans, AND Iraqies, better diplomacy world-wide, and A LOT LESS FEAR and terror in the world.
yeah people will say "that'd suck" I say to them- get real, get a life!

2006-08-21 01:01:09 · answer #9 · answered by omnimog 4 · 2 0

He might have actually won. Who knows? Check out Greg Palast's investigative report about exit polls.

Anyway, I think America would be loved again if Kerry were in. Gore would have been better, and he actually DID win!

2006-08-21 01:05:41 · answer #10 · answered by tiko 4 · 3 1

Kerry is Bush cousin. Their family are closely related.
They are both Skull and Bone members. A secrets society,made to destry American sovereignty, and Constitution. The SKULL AND BONE SOCIETY is a faction of the Illuminati.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8150571337669145794&q=Bush+skull

Whetever who win, they win. It would have been just the same, maybe a fragrance sweeter....

And this is what Bush’s minions had to say in 2000;-
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Confessions (Nuremberg Diary)
http://www.snopes2.com/quotes/goering.htm

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the United Nations Business Council in September 1994

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)

Make you investigations about Jesuits, the New World Order, the Illuminatis, the Free-Masonery, the Death Clan. They plan a world reduction of population of 80%...Far worse than Hitler...

1. Monetary and sex bribery was to be used to obtain control of men already in high places in the various levels of all governments and other fields of endeavor. Once influential persons had fallen for the lies, deceits, and temptations of the Illuminati, they were to be held in bondage by application of political and other forms of blackmail, threats of financial ruin, public exposure, and physical harm, even death to themselves and loved members of their families.

2. The Illuminati who were on the faculty of colleges and universities were to cultivate students possessing exceptional mental ability and who belonged to well-bred families with international leanings, and recommend them for special training in Internationalism. Such training was to be provided by granting scholarships, like the Rhodes Scholarship, to those selected by the Illuminati. All such scholars were to be first persuaded and then convinced that men of special talent and brains had the right to rule those less gifted on the grounds that the masses do not know what is best for them physically, mentally, and spiritually.

2006-08-21 01:11:18 · answer #11 · answered by The Patriot 4 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers