2006-08-20 17:19:47 · 17 answers · asked by 5375 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
TO SENIOR CITIZEN: If I remember correctly, Ronald Reagan and his bunch of morons sold weapons to Iran and Iraq for money, so the Republicans first started supporting terrorism. Clinton also went to war in Bosnia, so I don't think he supported it. He did something bush isn't doing now, which is to have the rest of the world involved, not anger the Middle East people who once supported us. It wasn't Clinton who made Lebanon so pissed at our policies that they voted for Hezbollah to run their country. Think about it...
2006-08-20 17:42:44 · answer #1 · answered by linus_van_pelt68 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think not. Mr. Bush uses the fear of "them" to control "us". Whether it's Al-Quaida or Hezbollah the use of the word terrorist scares people into supporting him and, thus, supporting his "wars on terror". The majority of Lebanese people do not consider Hezbollah to be terrorists, yet the word is used daily in our media and by "our favorite son". Mr. Bush will someday be seen for what he really is. Hopefully, before it is too late.
2006-08-21 00:52:12 · answer #2 · answered by cozyflower@sbcglobal.net 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually he has. But the most important issues is terrorism. He should talk about it more. His first duty is to protect and preserve the Nation, when it comes to every thing else we should be able to take care of ourselves!
2006-08-21 00:35:47 · answer #3 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Terrorism is a deadly "sneak-attack" criminal force that has been around, largely uncontrolled, for centuries. In recent years it has been growing at a rapid pace. It is now becoming exceedingly dangerous to all of us in America, as well as the rest of the world.
Bill Clinton did nothing about world terrorism. In fact, he enabled it. Clinton's likely successors in the Democratic party hope to NEGOTIATE an end to terrorism, which is ridiculous. They even DUMPED Senator Joe Lieberman because of his support for a strong anti-terroist position
2006-08-21 00:35:08 · answer #4 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I saw one about the amber alert act, I don't remember him talking about terrorism or terrorists.
But he did talk about child abducters as a reason to start setting up gestapo like check points...Something like that. I was pretty tired.
2006-08-21 01:53:01 · answer #5 · answered by cat_Rett_98 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush uses terrorism as a means to keep his sheep in line and afraid. There will be another attack on the U.S. before election time. I would bet on it.
2006-08-21 00:25:14 · answer #6 · answered by shirley e 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, terror is his favorite word..
It give him President Autority on time of war.
2006-08-21 00:35:53 · answer #7 · answered by The Patriot 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I will answer your question with other pertaining questions.
Is it important for a President to discuss major problems in the world?
Is terrorism one of those major problems?
2006-08-21 00:29:35 · answer #8 · answered by Kountry 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Terror is already over used and abused to protect self interests and greed.
2006-08-21 00:23:32 · answer #9 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No.
www.votetoimpeach.org
2006-08-21 00:37:29 · answer #10 · answered by soulsearcher 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋