English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

Not necessarily. Sometimes people deserve to have it shown from time to time.

2006-08-20 17:19:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Anger itself has its own negative reward such as your mind is not think straight, not making the right decision because our mind is clouded which we do not think about the long term effect. in extreme cases we might expressed the anger physically which will causing you and other harm. Instead of saying that one who express anger is a loser, I would feel sorry for that person. Not just Anger, but also hatred, jealousy, etc..

2006-08-21 01:01:13 · answer #2 · answered by Ah Dot 1 · 0 0

It depends who you're dealing with. Sometimes you can express your anger and people don't listen. I was working in an office where I went to my superiors on several occasions and there was two occasions where I expressed myself well in a group meeting but because I wasn't frothing at the mouth nobody paid attention. When I lost my temper, yelled, slammed doors and told people off, suddenly I had everyone's attention and several peoples sympathies and apologies for what had gone on. But when they asked me what could be done to repair the damage I wasn't interested anymore and quit. Sometimes the biggest losers are the people you have to get mad at so they will listen.

2006-08-21 00:27:41 · answer #3 · answered by Lynn K 5 · 0 0

My opinion is that every measure of self control is a measure of self respect. Taking the high road is often better. This does not mean you have to be a doormat, but expressing yourself in a calm manner shows you have yourself together and you are not stooping to someone else's level. I always have more respect for someone who has the maturity to say what is on their mind in a confident manner. Feelings should be expressed, and temper supressed.

2006-08-21 11:28:26 · answer #4 · answered by livelaughlove 2 · 0 0

Depends on the person or the situation.

Some people is a habitual anger show-off especially those with subordinates reporting to them. This is a way of showing their power. To put it negatively, they are inferior and demand some form of respect.

Sometimes, the person is under stress, hence can't control their temper.

2006-08-21 00:25:15 · answer #5 · answered by Asia 2 · 0 0

Expressing anger and blowing up are two different things. Reaching the point of yelling, hitting, kicking, or other temper tantrums only really signifies a lack of self control.

They just don't care to control their temper and refuse to take responsibility for it.

2006-08-21 02:36:42 · answer #6 · answered by David W 4 · 0 0

I'm sorry, but in my usage of the English language there is no difference between showing anger and expressing it. And when you talk about a "loser", then I don't seem to know what that is either. Let me try and work it out. A loser is someone with whom one wouldn't want to associate because that person would suck you dry and then still be thoroughly incapable and incompetent when it comes to creating any sort of life for himself or herself or when it comes to gaining any kind of respect from other people. But I think I understand losers. You see, I used to be a loser. But because of my high intellligence I managed to cover it up for most of the time. You see, a loser is someone who is so perceptive thate he or she sees nearly all life choices as thoroughly defective. A loser is somone whose sense of vision tells him that somewhere out there buried beneath all of the sh_t are many, many wonderful things that are actually worth having. It's just that the loser doesn't know how to get his or her hands on any of them. The loser sees no point in "playig the game" as most other people do. The loser prefers loving sex to compulsive masterbatioon and he sees "playing the game" as just one long continuous ****. He or she looks down on other people for their lack of vision, their lack of imagination, their capacity for accepting relatively unrewarding compromise and their ignorance. But he or she envies the relative ability of "adjusted" people to tolerate all of the sh_t that life normally throws at us. The loser quietly, or not so quietly, rambles through life collecting information about the meaning of life and sharing what he knows on this subject with anyone who might be interested. The loser is motivated by the hope that perhaps someone, someday, will discover the true meaning of life so that no one ever again has to "play the game" and fake it.

And I say that the meaning of life is to learn how to cope, manage, survive and thrive and to work on improving these abilities as frequently as you like.. When life is proving more difficult than usual one should work on these skills. When life is unfolding smoothly, satisfactorarily or happily then there may be little need to work on these skills but you may choose to do so anyway because it is not always a good idea to wait until your back is against a wall before you consider improving your life skills (coping skills, management skills, survival skills, thriving skills and a big bunch of other things).

Now I say, that if expressing your anger helps with your objectives and purposes, then go ahead and do it. And, if your prefered way of expressing your anger helps you with your objectives and purposes, then go ahead and and do it your way. But don't cause problems for yourself unless you are relatively sure that you know what you are doing.

Martin Camden.

martincamden@hotmail.com

2006-08-21 01:30:22 · answer #7 · answered by optimaxim 3 · 0 0

This is a good question! I sometimes show anger as well but I try really hard to keep it under control! So i guess, it's not realy appropriate but it happens sometimes, because we are humans!

2006-08-21 00:37:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Emotional modulation is important with interpersonal relationships. I subliminate my anger through exercise, and try to use self-control.

2006-08-21 02:09:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, because it depends on the circumstances of which anger may be necessary to be shown.

2006-08-21 00:20:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers