does he lie to the public about his motives and his plans?
(for any reason other than there own safety, [wich is plain old b.s.])
2006-08-20 16:43:06 · 17 answers · asked by sikn_shadow_420 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
WITCHTWO think, before you speak!
the UN sent many relief aid workers to africa, and other contries in need of help and they sent aid to victims of hurricane Katrina as well. and....
...oh yeah, they put an end to ww2 by creating and enforcing the "traite de versaille" , i think they played their part at geneva, but, you wouldn't know a damn thing about that would you? american soldiers oversea's commit war crimes on a daily basis but that ok, right?
your pathetic.
2006-08-20 17:24:41 · update #1
Of course
Turn off the fricken TV and wake up people. People answering this question with comments like Bush is the only one stopping another disaster in this country are obviously uneducated, TV zombies. Do some research on your own instead of sitting there letting the TV tell you what's what! Damn, just look into how much money Bush has given the TV networks, fake news stories - on and on. TV is scaring you into giving up your rights for your safety and you fricken zombies are sitting there believing everything that your TV is telling you - unbelievable.
2006-08-20 17:18:54 · answer #1 · answered by chadman 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
First, it's called spell check. I suggest you use it.
Second, his foreign policy, yes. His policy of pre-emption blew up in his face. Both Iran and North Korea have nukes. And systems to deliver them with. It also paved the way for any 3rd world country to have an excuse for invading another country. He's also played into the hands of terrorists. They're taking the lessons learned in Iraq and have started to export them.
As for being a threat to the american people, only if the next president continues his domestic policies. Which I hope to God he's smarter.
2006-08-21 00:04:31 · answer #2 · answered by darkemoregan 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
I think Bush should be up for a Nobel Peace Prize, but won't be given the politics behind the award. The free Western World should be on their knees daily thanking President Bush for his service to our country.
If Jimmy 'the do nothing' President Carter could allow American hostages to remain captive for 444 days; allow interest rates to go to 22%; be so foolish as to try to put a price ceiling on gasoline; etc. etc. and still win a Nobel Peace Prize, it is prima facia evidence of the graft and corruption behind even the awarding of something like the Nobel Peace Prize.
President Bush is not doing what he is doing to win popularity, unlike Bill Clinton's every move. He is doing what he knows is the right thing for our country. Popular or not.
You don't do the dirty work that Clinton refused to do for eight years and then do 'double duty' on your watch as his successor, without getting some negative feedback. But the left doesn't understand that.
President Bush has the guts and wisdom to do, and is doing, what Billy Boy Clinton was too ignorant and gutless to do. You should be on your knees daily thanking President Bush for his courage and wisdom for the leadship his has proved this country.
Unless, of course, you speak Arabic and are part of the jihad.
2006-08-21 00:04:25 · answer #3 · answered by scubadiver50704 4 · 5⤊ 5⤋
Bush is a threat to the United States, the world, and most of all himself. He has with the help of Cheney and Rove managed to alienate the U.S. from alot of countries. Plus he is alienating himself from most citizens. It will be a miracle if he doesn't destroy what rights we have left before he gets out of office. The "man" should have been impeached a long time ago.
Clinton screwed an intern but Dubya has screwed the United States!!!!!!!
2006-08-21 00:00:52 · answer #4 · answered by shirley e 7 · 6⤊ 5⤋
TREATH? What the hell is that? Remember, yall vote demokrat now, soz weez can keep the food paintrees open fer the po peepul. GO SOCIALISTS!!!
2006-08-20 23:56:59 · answer #5 · answered by MARIA 4 · 6⤊ 2⤋
world peace is an unachievable goal by very human nature
2006-08-20 23:50:23 · answer #6 · answered by what the heck 3 · 5⤊ 2⤋
I hear his mother would never let him have sharp objects growing up.
Now look what we have let him play with.
This guy is a threat to everyone around!
2006-08-21 00:04:55 · answer #7 · answered by Michael B 3 · 3⤊ 4⤋
The answer is yes on all counts. Enough said.
2006-08-21 00:04:51 · answer #8 · answered by brian 2010 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
you think because he is proactive and doesn't take other countries hypocrisy that he is dangerous.......he does not lie to his people. He has done things no one else had the balls to do to protect our freedom and our nation. Yeah, it may piss off other nations that we are the world police, but what the hell has the UN ever done to protect anyone?
2006-08-20 23:51:44 · answer #9 · answered by WitchTwo 6 · 5⤊ 6⤋
Absolutely not. He is the only thing that stands between us and disaster.
2006-08-20 23:52:02 · answer #10 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 6⤊ 5⤋