English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I amr referring to the news about the Hon. Anna Diggs Taylor decision, the federal judge in Michigan, and the plaintiffs including the ACLU, Greenpeace, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, to declare unconstitutional the warrantless wiretapping by the NSA and other secret government agencies. This news became public three or four days ago.

2006-08-20 16:34:46 · 15 answers · asked by stephen k 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

15 answers

Its already on appeal. I hope they keep them.

2006-08-20 16:41:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Big problem with Freedom of the Press now days is that the news segment has to be as competitively profitable as the Used Car Section of the daily newspaper. If it is not, then the profit committee of the privately owned TV Network hires someone like Russ Limpbow to spout insanity.
It is a very serious problem for a democracy because who is going to inform the citizens when the moneyed corporations own the media and also strongly support the Republican Party and the Bush's?
Maybe George Bush had the right idea when he hired a phony reporter to ask preplanned questions at the new conferences, Bush seemed to really enjoy it and had a ten minute answers ready that seemed both sincere and wise.
When Gore is hired in 08 to be President, maybe we could get Hillary Clinton hired as a reporter for the New Your Times and have her asking question of the New President.
What do you think?

2006-08-20 17:14:17 · answer #2 · answered by zclifton2 6 · 1 0

human beings can say what they need even with the undeniable fact that in reality u.s. is a large u . s . and the data is sweet precise right here in this website. we've the luxury to declare even with we need through utilising actuality we are free. Btw we persons have the luxury to gripe as long as we need as long as we we voted. someone suggested that he change into more desirable effective than our very last 3 presidents. there is no longer any way Obama is an better effective president than bill Clinton. i do no longer care what he did in his inner optimal existence. That guy had us out of the pink for the first time in an prolonged time. of direction, Bush positioned us precise lower back in and Obama does no longer seem getting us out each and every time immediately. i do no longer vote social accumulating. I vote baby-kisser, who i imagine of is superb to lead our u . s .. there's a distinction between saying some aspect and doing it. optimal of human beings vote social accumulating and that is it. they do no longer take a lengthy time period to seem at a baby-kisser's journey, record or skills. Jobs and the business gadget would want to be a appropriate priority precise now. i have were given no longer seen plenty replace. i desire Obama will prepare me incorrect. There has to go back lower back an element at the same time as they ought to stop blaming previous administrations and basically get on and fix the problem concerns. also I rather have defense force service grownup adult adult males in my kinfolk. all those who complains about what a unfavourable u . s . the stunning u . s . a . is can bypass away at each and every time. We precise right here were born into freedom yet we would want to always by no skill ignore about that it truly is a few aspect grownup adult adult males have fought and died for and although do. They gave and although grant their lives for the rights we've. Their households suffered and although do alongside with them. i'm proud to be an American and to me I stay interior the superb u . s . in the international.

2016-11-26 20:43:20 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Because Yahoo news is wise enough to realize Judge Taylor is only one Federal judge (a Jimmy Carter appointed proven liberal at that) with only one opinion that is most certainly going to be overturned. It's her "15 minutes of fame". No different than so many others ahead of her that sought glory and recognition when they thought the time was right, only to realize how foolish they were in the long run.

What people (and organizations) won't do the get recognition. Sometimes even ask foolish questions on Yahoo answers.

2006-08-20 16:48:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Ask who owns Yahoo? Who has controlling or majority investor interest? Most information on the planet is controlled by a small, elite group of people. Why doesn't NPR ever report on Walmart's abuses? Because they receive LOTS of funding from Walmart! Which is a shame, cause I really respect NPR (National Public Radio...Mandelit del Barco...what a beautiful voice! Sigh...)

On a darker note, we'll never know what govenmental goon squads visit Yahoo CEO houses in a swanky California suburb in the dark of night armed with stuff best left to Scorcese and nightmares. Heck, here's to hoping they don't visit your or my door tonight!!!!

"The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." Thomas Jefferson

2006-08-20 16:44:28 · answer #5 · answered by necesitoukemi 2 · 2 1

AOL time warner, news corp, GE, Westinghouse, own all of the media in the US are huge lobbyists and need the Bush administration on their side to make more money and keep their power, they control what news we see

2006-08-20 16:45:36 · answer #6 · answered by no_tan_linz 1 · 1 0

Another one of Jimmy Carter's fine appointees (Anna Diggs bin Taylor). His blunders still continue to plague us until this day. After all he his the one who handed Iran to Ayatollah Khomeini on a silver platter in1979. Look what that got us!

2006-08-20 16:50:26 · answer #7 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 0 2

You a member of the ACLU? building a case to sue some one?

2006-08-24 09:30:13 · answer #8 · answered by clophad 2 · 0 0

yea and Spector and Cheney have set forth a bill to counter the judges decision,, so Supreme Court here we come,, Bush has committed 30 federal crimes with his illegal unconstitutional, unlawfulness,,,,,,,, I hope he goes to jail and gets impeached,, and Cheney too,,,,, the court put them in power and they should take than down

2006-08-20 16:43:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

i have read a few articles on yahoo about this, I am very happy there is a judge some where keeping big brother in check

2006-08-20 16:41:28 · answer #10 · answered by blue_eyed_southernman 4 · 1 2

If you have nothing to hide why would you care? I would rather have them to find terrorist then to have another 9/11, remember they only have certain words that get flagged, like bomb, explosives and stuff like that.

2006-08-20 16:44:34 · answer #11 · answered by racing_jrfan 3 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers