in this case, the math models the real cases exactly because the definition of "percent increase" is very specific
if you had no cats, and you got 10 cats, there is no way to express a percentage increase, it is UNDEFINED
if you had one cat and you you got another, that is a 100% increase
you could get a calculator and multiply 1 by 100% and you get 1
if you had 0 cats and got one, what % would you multiply zero by to get one
there is no solution, anything you multiply zero by is zero
you cannot express a change from "zero" as a percent increase (or decrease)
2006-08-20 16:03:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by enginerd 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you really need an answer, then you can define a background term, ie a constant term, C.
So the % increase is (19 + C)/C * 100%.
So, if C is 1, then (19 + 1)/1 * 100% = 2000%
2006-08-20 16:09:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by ali 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's a good question. I suspect in order to calculate a percentage increase, we would have to start with at least one pimple, other wise it just doesn't make any real sense - from zero to any quantity just doesn't lend itself to a percentage comparison.
2006-08-20 16:04:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
For people finding this later, the answer is infinity.
Limits exist to find the answers to undefined problems (like this one).
In this case, Limit of ( (End - Start) / Start) as Start approaches 0 = Positive Infinity
2016-01-21 16:12:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sean 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/aw3ng
We don't need tax increases. We need more tax payers, which only come from more jobs. Where are all the jobs jobs jobs that were Hussein's priorities? I'm not talking about Government jobs, I am talking about JOBS.
2016-04-02 06:43:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
To calc. your percentage increase/decrease:
(x_new - x_old)/x_old
As pointed out, in this case it is undefined. Why? Division by zero.
2006-08-20 16:09:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by a_liberal_economist 3
·
0⤊
0⤋