English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We need a change, bottom line. Love her or hate her, but it is time for a strong woman in office. Not because she is a woman, but because she is a smart woman and knows her stuff.......

2006-08-20 15:27:49 · 51 answers · asked by smiddro 2 in Politics & Government Government

51 answers

1. I don't think she's electable.

2. She shifts around the political winds too much

3. We need someone solid and committed to positive change - not to getting elected

2006-08-20 15:37:24 · answer #1 · answered by Skeff 6 · 2 3

You are going to get childish answers like "shes a dyke" and "shes an ugly S***" and other such blatant ignorance ,Ive seen them before to a question similar to yours.
But speaking facts,I want an electable candidate to run for the Presidency in 2008,we must offer a person that is not burdened by stereotypes and generalizations.If indeed Mrs.Clinton proves to be that person ,yes of course Id vote for her.I will vote for the candidate that can defeat any one the Republicans offer.Please do not throw your vote away by voting for some minor party that doesn't have a chance in hell of winning.If you splinter your vote by doing that you are voting for a republican.....Vote Democratic and make your vote count against the republicans not for them.November is just around the corner,get out the vote.in the mid term elections and 2008 will be even easier.

C.Rice is a Bush clone and I don't want any
more clones in office.You talk about
Mrs.Clinton being a liar and worse,
What the hell do you think Bush is?
Hes the laughing stock of the world,
a undereducated,
inarticulate,
warmonger,that has brought shame to
this great country.You see everything
I just said is true,not supposition,
FACTS not fallacy.
Try the truth,its a great equalizer.

2006-08-27 01:32:15 · answer #2 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 0 0

No!
Not because she is a woman, but just because she is Hillary and a Clinton.
because she yells and screams and I don't even know about what?
She voted for the war, and now acts like she is against it, but she has not retracted her vote for it, Playing both ends against the middle!
She gave her husband advise, and look what it did for him, Smart, I think not!
She became a New York Senator because of the Jewish vote and she got that because Bill gave a last minute pardon to those Jewish Rabbi's.
You want a smart , woman as president , Vote for Condalisa Rice.She's a minority also! I think she is a sweet woman that is also strong in her beliefs of how the country should be run. She won't follow the polls!She can handle the job!

2006-08-26 17:17:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

As for Hilary Clinton being smart, you bet she is. She is smarter then any president we have had and of course so much smarter the the idiot in office now.
If the American people would only give that lady a chance to prove herself and what good she can and would do for this country as well as for the world and for those chauvinist males who think a woman would only make matters worse they better take a long look at where the world is now and we have had nothing but males in office and we are one country that is hated so badly because of what our "male" presidents have done to us as well as the rest of the world too.
If Hilary Clinton should get elected just listen to all the men complain that she hasn't gotten us out of debt but forget that we have never been out of debt yet because of the males in office who insist on wars and lies and spending needlessly.
I for one would vote for this lady and pray that this country wakes up long enough to do the same.

2006-08-26 21:08:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

As someone in political office myself I would not vote for Hillary Clinton because she cant make up her mind. Before she married Bill she was a hard Republican and changed her party for the sake of getting him to marry her. Then once she ran and won in New York she has gone back to being on more middle ground. As a member of the Republican party, the reason I feel that a person must state one affiliation and not jump around is because it lets people know where you stand on all the issues. (Even if some dont quite go along with your party.) With Hillary I feel that she picks which ever is in at the time or which ever will help her to get her way the quickest. Like a scam artist. I think she may be a great president but I think she is a slick as Bill was. (Great president, even better actor.)

2006-08-26 16:08:17 · answer #5 · answered by prezprez9 1 · 1 2

You wrote, "...[I]t is time for a strong woman in office. Not because she is a woman, but because she is a smart woman and knows her stuff."

Umm, so I shouldn't vote for her because she's a woman. I should vote for her 'cause she's a SMART woman who knows her stuff. Isn't this the same thing as saying I should vote for her BECAUSE she's a woman who happens to be smart?

Anyway, it all depends on who is running against Hillary Rodham Clinton (I like the sound of it already: PRESIDENT HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON).

I mostly vote Democrat or for an independent when the Democrat that's running sucks.

Supposedly, Republican Rudy Giuliani is gonna run against her and if that's the case, it will be hard for me to pick one or the other. I think New York Rudy is exactly the kind of politician we need in La Casa Blanca. I wouldn't hesitate to vote for him just because he's a freakin' Republican. I mean, I didn't like the way he acted sometimes as Mayor of New York City, but hey, he got **** done! He cleaned up the city, he ran it with almost military precision, and the guy practically held our hands through the 2001 World Trade Center attack while Bushy was out hiding in some plane.

On the other hand, I have a lot of respect for Hillary and the things she's accomplished: becoming a lawyer, senator, putting up with Bill's bull****, just to name a few. I'd be lying if I said I won't vote for her just because it would be historic for her to win the presidency. In fact, one of the main reasons I would vote for her over Rudy, besides what I think of her accomplishments, is because I WANT to be part of history and vote her into office.

So, in conclusion, my fellow obnoxious Americans, I am leaning towards voting for Ol' Hill', but if Rudy IS the Republican candidate, well, I guess I'll have to flip a coin.

Incidentally, I shook both Hillary's and Rudy's hand at a parade in New York City a few years ago. Looking back at it, I now take this as a fateful sign of things to come.

2006-08-20 16:00:13 · answer #6 · answered by Big D 2 · 1 1

I would, because she'd be the democrat. But if a good green party candidate runs, I'll vote for that one, because I don't want a woman to be president. I might be accepting of the fact, if Hillary wins, but that doesn't change much.

2006-08-20 15:33:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If she were honest and not manipulative then maybe. If she were not a socialist, then possibly.

Had she not sold her soul to a few billionaires and the lawyers and lobbyists, perhaps. You do have to question why the insurance companies are throwing so much money at her, do they think they can stick it to the public even more with her support? Were you aware she has raised more money from big corporations and socialist billionaires than any other person, ever?

But considering all of the above she does not warrant any consideration whatsoever.

I do agree about a strong woman however.

2006-08-25 04:09:57 · answer #8 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 2 1

Future voting in America is irrelevant.
If there are elections, (which there might not be due to the imminent imposure of martial law), then the results will be predetermined by money, and the computers will calculate how many votes to allocate to each candidate. What you mark or score or vote is merely a show to keep you quiet.
Mecico's recent 'election' was a practice round.

2006-08-26 16:44:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

No I wouldn't vote for her. I don't see her as a particularly smart woman and definitely not a strong one.

I don't see what she has achieved that makes her suitable for holding the highest office in America.

She has no real platform. She waves with the popularity poll - from side to side without a sturdy opinion of her own.

She didn't even blush when she said she didn't realize they weren't entitled to take the whitehouse furniture with them when they left. But they did return it. PLEASE!

And where was her backbone when her husband was exposed for repeatedly betraying her and she was still able to walk in front of millions of people while lovingly holding onto his arm.

We do need a change......and hey, guess what? We're going to have a change no matter who you vote for because George W cannot run again.

Let's try to choose someone who has something to offer this country...some strength, morals, dedication, pride, honor.....those small things that have grown so scarce over these past years.

2006-08-20 15:57:34 · answer #10 · answered by purplewings123 5 · 3 1

**** no, lets not talk about what I would do. Lets discuss what I wouldnt do. I would not under any circumstances vote for Hillary Clinton as president. Hell, if you want to see her wast a bunch of money on a presidential campaign. Yeah lets bring the girls out and have a good old fashioned mud fight.

2006-08-20 15:55:43 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers