A big part of the answer is where the Jews would have settled after WWII since this was the start of Israel with the mass exodus. If we just say that the millions of Jews did not settle in the Middle East.
Then without the exodus, the Jews in Palestine would have survived but not prospered. Their probably would have been no war to create the country. The Palestine's who were in past a well educated society, would not have had such a deep continued hatred of the Jews as a majority of the population. Their would not have been the training camps on the West bank and other countries which were run by Russia, China and other non-Islamic countries. Their probably not have had the start of state sponsored terrorism in the Middle East so we would not see any of the re surged deeps seated hatred drive the Middle Eastern Islamics to hatred of an easy to identify State.
On the whole I think if these initial events did not develop the way it did we would all be better off.
PS. A good point to argue back is that the US and Communist word wide long protracted cold war would have still produced a similar situation.
2006-08-20 16:01:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
i won't have the capacity to have self assurance you surely have self assurance that Muslims will sooner or later unite. the two communities are basically diverse and are incapable of appearing as a cohesive unit. it relatively is glaring in very almost each and every Islamic state. usa did no longer pit Sunnis against Shiite or Jews against Muslims. They controlled to hate one yet another on their very own. I comprehend that Israel develop into created out of Palestine after WWII; even with the shown fact that, it develop into no longer usa that did that, however the UN. sure, the United international locations-the inefficient coalition of blatantly distinctive international locations. We, the U.S., are no longer completely answerable for the existence of Israel. i'm no longer asserting that our remote places coverage is mind-blowing. I comprehend that we've made severe blunders interior the previous. That, even with the shown fact that, does not advise that we are answerable for the present concern interior the middle East. If center jap international locations won't have the capacity to stay away from their destruction from their very own electorate, how do you assume an entire area/faith to return at the same time and combat the "White devil"?
2016-12-11 12:20:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
First off you must not have studied history! Israel or the Jewish people have been there for over 3000 years.
Secondly the Palestinians were the ones who were dumped there by the other Arab countriess because they did not want the nomads in their countrie.
Lastly there has never been much peace between any of the Arab countries with or without the Jewish people. The land would be barren and a large waste. Like it was before the Jewish people were aloud to have their country back.
2006-08-20 17:47:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by fatboysdaddy 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
During the time that Israel was out of there they faught with every nation surrounding them. Look at the history they faught worst then then they do now.
Afganistan just got out of a war with Russia has nothing to do with israel. In Africa 4 tribes of Islamic terriorists are fighting has nothing to do with Isreal. They bombed USA Israel isn't here either. Stop the hate before you are the ones who die.
Stop the hate, before it is to late to save yourselves.
Israel isn't your problem, USA Isn't your problem. Hate is your problem.
t
2006-08-20 15:02:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
i think that it a good thing Israel is Ianthe middle east. they are the only ones that are cleaning up the place and are the U.S watch dogs . the us has to much influence over the whole situation
2006-08-20 15:00:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by toolman 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Israel would still be a barren land as it was befor... The israelies have transformed it into a prosperous area from the desert.
No matter what else you may think, you cannot deny that.
2006-08-20 15:03:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I guess it would be like Syria, Lebanon, Iran, and its other neighbours. There would be less development, less agriculture, less education, less democracy.
2006-08-20 17:21:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by lottyjoy 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
they would find some way to kill each other.
2006-08-20 15:05:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
what was that
2006-08-20 15:01:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by philip m 2
·
0⤊
0⤋