Hell No!
2006-08-20 14:43:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no still NO no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no
2006-08-20 15:40:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by jake mills 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
George W. Bush will not be running again, since he has already had two terms as President.
However, he has done more for America than he is given credit for. President Bush is an intelligent, moral, brave, and brilliant man. He is portrayed by the media as being stupid and incompetent, but this is far from accurate. Most of the criticism toward Pres. Bush is because of Iraq. But let's think about that for a moment.
Pres. Bush is having trouble in Iraq primarily because Americans can't stomach the kind of war it would take to tame Iraq. If we study history, we find that empires like Babylon, Rome, Greece, Assyria, etc. were able to keep insurgents down because they were willing to engage in whatever activity was necessary to bring the people into submission. If this included killing civilians, pillaging towns, or performing hideous acts like rape or infanticide, the emperors were willing and the people didn't have much voice in it. But that kind of thing goes against American values (and I'm not saying it shouldn't).
I'm not convinced that Iraq is ready for democracy. It may be necessary to install a dictator friendly to the West and call it a day. The Muslim terror problem is not going to go away even if Iraq becomes the finest republic on earth. America must decide whether she will go to war willing to do WHATEVER is required to win, or whether we will remain more isolationist. No Democrat is better suited than President Bush to make this decision, and most (like Hilary Clinton) would make disastrous decisions that would make us the target of even more terrorist activity.
So, yes, I'll be voting Republican in the elections this fall as well as in the Presidential election in 2008.
2006-08-20 14:56:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Joshua V 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Lets see, since Bush has been in office, another 2500 Americans have been killed in an ill thought out war. Gas is up to an average of $3.00 a gallon. Home heating will cost $200. to $400 a month this winter depending on the size and age of your house. Medical expenses for the elderly are running about $400 a month if they have any health problems. The rich are getting a tax break and the middle class are losing jobs to illegals. He defends torture and illegal wire tapping. The world is less safe than it has ever been. All in all, I'd say I probably would not vote for him.
2006-08-20 15:13:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by jackie 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Georg W. Bush deserves votes.
2006-08-20 14:48:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by snashraf 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
i did no longer like bush and that i'm balloting in certainty i voted the day previous for Romney thank you in case you have been balloting for politicians who promise to offer you candies at somebody else's cost, then you definately have not got any suited to compalin while they take you funds and supply it to somebody else. that is staggering that folk who think of we will not have the money for docs, hospitals and drugs someway think of that we could have the money for docs, hospitals, drugs and a central authority paperwork to manage it. maximum of the social history of the western international, over the final 3 many years, has been a history of fixing what worked with what sounded good. between the outcomes of such notions as entitlements is that folk who've contributed no longer something to society sense that society owes them something. I even have by no ability understood why that's GREED to choose to maintain the money you have earned, yet no longer greed to choose to take somebody else's funds
2016-12-17 14:22:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by melancon 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, I'm overseas and there doesn't seem to be time for an absentee vote, so I don't even get to vote. Could you like give us a little more advance notice next time?
2006-08-20 23:25:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Azriel 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, because George Bush would not be running. His term would be up.
2006-08-20 14:44:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by DikkiJones 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
you can't. An American President can only serve two terms
2006-08-20 14:44:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by D-Train 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
YES
No question about it ...............
Have lived through years of people screaming that Bush was stupid - when that line didn't work Bush was then an evil genius.
2006-08-20 15:21:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Akkita 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
they cant run 3 times .. But nope I wouldnt
2006-08-20 14:44:53
·
answer #11
·
answered by mr_know_it_all_12345 3
·
0⤊
1⤋