How Much Power Do They Ultimately Want?

Question

The leaders of the Neo-Conservative movement have established the "Project for a New American Century". The title and nature of this organization made up of some of the World's most powerful men seems to outline American dominance of the planet. What do these men ultimately want? Would they strive for as much as a one-world government controlled by Neo-Cons? How close are we to this already?

This is a question to see what various people think on the subject so please don't attack just answer honestly if you wish to share your thoughts on the matter. Thanks!

http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm

Answer 1

wow, this is pretty frightening. as I have said in other postings, I feel that it is up to us as concerned citizens to change the government to that in which we see fit. if our govenrment changes for the better, GOOD. we need a change. very badly. I am very upset about the way things are being run in our nation's capital and in our nation's states. Our "leaders" seem to be untouchable. this is not the way it should be. they should bend over backwards to serve the people...we are the people. I have not felt as though our "leaders" are serving our best interests...

it's a shame that there are not enough of us who are willing to make a change. I blame this on the way U.S. (and other)society[ies] is[are] raising their families...

Answer 2

america may be dominant, but look around... who really holds the planet in terms of people? in terms of the market? in terms of technology?

truth is scary... asians are more dominant. they hold the real power. technology wise (japan), people wise (china, vietnam, india), threat wise (middle east countries, north korea too).... market wise, european countries dominate it more. america just want to have some sort of control where they can have even just a piece of the world (they really are just for check and balance, you see).

in as much as we hate to admit, it seems america (to us) is the real power player because of their involvement in almost all aspect of planetary issue. they are the leaders, but that doesn't mean they have the real control. they only try to maintain the balance. no, i'm not totally sold to their ideals but someone must lead a pack (good or bad), right?

if having one whole government for all nations of the world is utopia, i don't see it that way.... thing is, the United Nations itself is doing so. they are the ones in power. they dictate the outcome of what seems and what is. they are the real government of all government. america is just the teacher's pet, get it? or the bully for that matter. in fact, don't they get the most criticisms on all aspects of planetary issues?

just this, an organization must always have a leader. trouble is, sometimes they became the scapegoats, sometimes they are the sacrificial lambs. so better be aware of what really gives and what must one be prepared of for the coming generations....

Answer 3

I am, and everyone else should be, far more worried about how much power the Islamic Fascists want than how much power a particular political party in this country wants. In this country, the citizens (you know, the 40 some odd percent that don't even bother to vote) have no one to blame but themselves - it's easy to vote a particular party out of office come election time - and it takes place every four years - it's not so easy to deal with terrorism.

Answer 4

The concept of "American Interests" as pre-eminant is as dangerous to the human species, in it's entirety, as the belief that One Religion is the Only Way to God.

All humans, regardless of physical and cultural differences, are 99.9% genetically identical. The 0.1% difference causes eye color, hair color, skin color, height and weight variations, tones of voice, etc.

The Human Interest is the survival of the species. Not the fittest, but of the species in its entirety. The differences in culture, religion, politics, ethnicity and nationality are not biological but sociological. They are imaginary, made up, and invented by humans, not genetics. 500 years ago there were no Democrats and Republicans, Communists and Capitalists. It's an invention whose belief in seperation threatens the survival of the species.

1,000 years ago there were no Racists and Supremists. These are recent inventions whose belief in biological superiority threatens the survival of the species.

5,000 years ago there were no Christians and Muslims. These are recent inventions whose belief in seperation threatens the survival of the species.

For the human species to survive, we must embrace and transcend the concepts of intercultural Unity, interdependant economics, constant human variation, and the Sanctity of the Human Individual.

Answer 5

It's not American dominance they want. America is just the tool at the present time. They want a docile workforce, leaned out to their specs, under total domination.
Their children will be your children's masters!

Answer 6

the government is very corrupt and they always brake their own laws. especially laws about dealing with other counrties. eventually they will attempt to overthrow the UN and take over the world

Answer 7

They want what we want, obviously. They want something "new," must like us. We may none of us agree with their crazy way of getting something new, but what they want is no different than any thinking person in American. Something's got to give. What we have seems to be as worn out as our infrastructure. We need something new. You want that. I want that. They want that.

Answer 8

Republican war profiteers