Mr. Ramsey discovered the crime scene.
There is no evidence that suggests that either Ramsey were involved (except statistical probability which has nothing to do specifically with them), and much evidence points towards a stranger (like unknown DNA, shoe prints, ransom note).
I so hate that these people were maligned so horrifically in the past 10 years, and that Patsy Ramsey died with her reputation ruined. So unfair.
It should be a lesson for us all to presume people INNOCENT until proven guilty in a court of law. They were decent people that didn't deserve this. This amounted to a witch-hunt, and people's LIVES can be ruined because of such frenzy. The media has blame in this, as does the police department, but the public had a choice and unfortunately they chose to participate in the hysteria and rush to judgment.
2006-08-20 14:15:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by lily 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
I'm new on here, hope I am doing this right. I've followed this case from the start and read all the books. My feelings and gone back and forth many times. The biggest thing that strikes me NOW is that all I can see in the alleged confessors face is Jonbonnet - maybe I am nuts, but he sure looks like her or visa versa. I am now thinking (may she rest in peace) Patsy may have been orchestrating a kidnapping, the $118,000 was to go to the kidnapper to get him "off her back" for whatever he had on her
(meaning the mother) but things went very, very wrong. I am now thinking AGAIN that the note WAS written by Patsy. I am wondering if there is a crazy, off beat chance this jerk is the real father of that beautiful child? DNA will give us (hopefully) the needed info, and no one decent wants to tarnish those that have passed on, but it sure is looking once again like somehow, somewhere, and for some crazy reason Patsy may have been involved in this. I pray the real truth comes out somehow, some way. Not everyone who questions this is a "kook". Stranger thing in life have happened.
2006-08-20 14:49:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by patfabric 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
She is (i believe) 100% guilty and i think John Mark Karr is a lying psycho, he probably had nothing to do with it, hes just trying to cover something up or someone is holding something over his head (ie: John Ramsey)
they created a spoiled monster and didnt know what to do with her!
2006-08-20 14:17:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Fluffington Cuddlebutts 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
People prosecuted her enough when she was alive even though the law states she was Innocent till proving guilty I think that applies to the dead also so lets leave the dead alone.
2006-08-20 14:18:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Super 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think she did the actual deed. I think the death was an accident. I think Patsy was orchestrating a kidnapping and things went wrong.
2006-08-20 14:16:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was definately an inside job but I don't think it was specifically Patsy...maybe Jon Benet's brother...
2006-08-20 14:15:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Love always, Kortnei 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do you have a legitimate question, or are you just another one-man National Enquirer? If so, go lay down in the bird cage so my parrot can crap on you.
2006-08-20 14:15:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mr Smarty Pants 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Grow up. that little girl was worth far too much money to her for her to kill her. Any mother would feel guilty that she hadn't dome more to protect her children if their daughter was killed in her own home
2006-08-20 14:17:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by judy_r8 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Please let her alone! She has gone to be with her Creator and to join JonBenet. Stop pointing fingers and let her be in peace.
Personally, I do not think she or John had any involvement but that is just my opinion.
2006-08-21 02:12:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Guilty as charged she probably wanted sympathy
2006-08-20 14:16:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Me 2
·
0⤊
0⤋