NSA wiretapping program vs FISA court.?

Question

I am curious. Does anyone know what the NSA wiretapping program allows the government to do that the FISA court does not?

Let me clarify because I might be missing something. What I am trying to understand is what does the government lose by going through the FISA court, especially since they can obtain a warrant after the fact from a FISA judge. What capability does the NSA program give them that FISA doesn't.

Answer 1

FISA court is supposed to approve wiretaps that need to be kept secret from the public. NSA program did not go to FISA court, hence is illegal and unconstitutional and must be done correclty from now on. Unless of course you think the pres gets to violate whatever laws he wants to.

Answer 2

The FISA court does not really "do" anything. It just rules on the legality of programs like the NSA wiretapping. Except, the NSA program was not submitted to the FISA court for review.

Answer 3

some may argue that the administration did not use the FISA courtroom for those wiretaps in a planned attempt to render the courtroom superfluous and finally have it disbanded. it is an severe case of "reframing" to overturn the FISA Act and regulate the governmentdepartment's powers to contain warantless wiretapping persons persons. less than the FISA Act no you may pay interest to calls in the journey that they contain US persons (no remember the position they're) with out a warrant. a decision between 2 US persons, both distant places, will require a warrant less than the FISA Act. And FISA warrants could be received after the very truth. it really is totally criminal for the authorities to tap any call it needs see you later because it brings the region to the FISA courtroom interior of 40 8 hours. So the timeliness of the warrants isn't an situation. The administration is purely choosing to not use the courts.

Answer 4

Yes