2006-08-20 11:21:22 · 19 answers · asked by Piffle 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
America has proven already to be absolutely too stupid to vote atm. Look who we elected... Bush. So, unless there is a sudden magic wand waved that increases the intelligence level... no.
2006-08-20 11:31:20 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Make what? Vice President to Hillary Clinton?
Nah, no man named AL has ever been President, so Gore can go on doing his bit for the environment.
He should have given a try in 2004, but I think he's had his chance and the nation has moved beyond him.
2006-08-20 18:27:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The old Al Gore would of been president. The new far left Al Gore who has been proven to say anything to get elected, whether factual or not, cannot win. His own state didn't vote for him last time because they recognize it was not the same person they sent to the Senate.
2006-08-20 18:28:18 · answer #3 · answered by Paul S 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He made it the first time he ran, but he wasn't allowed to serve thanks to Jeb Bob in Florida and that antiquated piece of garbage we have known as the electoral college. If he were to run again, he'd probably get elected again - and maybe this time he could serve as president like he should be doing now. We'd be so much better off without George Bob, America's chimpanzee-in-chief.
2006-08-20 19:48:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not even the Democrats are that stupid. I think they will nominate Jesse Jackson and Homer Simpson. That way a token white guy will still be on the ballot.
2006-08-20 18:30:19 · answer #5 · answered by hardnose 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Make what? The next advance in Internet technology? With Tipper? Be specific.
2006-08-20 21:53:28 · answer #6 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Al Gore has nothing more to offer now than he had last time. Why should anyone consider him, regardless of party?
2006-08-20 18:28:27 · answer #7 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I um, don't think he's running, but I'd vote for him. He won the popular vote last time, and we'd be in such a better way if he had actually one. Damn those hanging chads!
2006-08-20 18:38:13 · answer #8 · answered by Ricky 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I doubt it. Too many dems are ticked that he gave up so easily last time when the election was obviously stolen.
2006-08-20 18:26:39 · answer #9 · answered by Phil S 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't know but I'd rather have him as president than Hillary Clinton.
2006-08-20 18:27:09 · answer #10 · answered by Martin523 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋