I mean, Champange and fried King Prawns. Really, in NO WAY WHATSOEVER should he have received that sort of treatment.
2006-08-20 10:44:31 · 24 answers · asked by Firefly 4 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
he only confessed so they would come and get him out of Thailand and bring him back to the states. where they will charge him with hindering an investigation or something stupid like that.
2006-08-20 10:52:50 · answer #1 · answered by Chuck H 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Innocent 'til proven guilty?? Maybe I will go to a foreign country, confess to a crime (I didn't commit any, but whatever) and be brought back to the US via 1st class...free alcohol!!!! (I'll pass on the prawns)
Seriously, though, guilty or not, proven or not...I don't think he should have received such privileged treatment.
2006-08-20 17:55:06 · answer #2 · answered by just me 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hello, this is America. You're not innocent until proven guilty. As of right now he's innocent so of course he should be treated like a human being. Maybe Champagne is going a little too far, but to act as if someone is guilty before their trial is immoral not mention illegal. I hope you're never falsely accused of a crime and treated like a criminal immediately
2006-08-20 17:53:01 · answer #3 · answered by candy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Like it or not, he hasn't been convicted of anything yet. He may very well be a monster, but until it is proven in court, he is still a human being and should be treated as such. If he is guilty, he will surely pay for it later. They don't much like child molesters in prison.
2006-08-20 18:44:20 · answer #4 · answered by jeffma807 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually it was business class. First of all, he hasn't been convicted yet. Secondly, his escorts, who must remain with him at all times, certainly don't want to be miserable during the flight. It's a loooooong flight. When he gets to the US justice will be served.
2006-08-20 18:17:02 · answer #5 · answered by dudezoid 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If he had been convicted of a crime I would agree. In America a person is innocent until proven guilty. If he is convicted I would pull the switch myself.
2006-08-20 17:53:54 · answer #6 · answered by vadragonslayer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There may be some sick twisted justice after all...???
http://www.hrw.org/reports/2001/prison/report4.html
He may very well feel the pain of being taken over and violated by someone larger than you and ultimately die.
2006-08-20 17:56:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He will also get 1st class treatment in prison. I bet his smile is gone then.
2006-08-20 17:52:07 · answer #8 · answered by chief8166 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes it is disgusting and they changed it from not guilty to innocent to innocent, not guilty and guilty currently i think he should be straped to a bomb and sent to jail without any food or water for ever
2006-08-20 17:54:31 · answer #9 · answered by Kydolf Bootler 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, stupid. He's to be considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Why dont young people know anything these days?
2006-08-20 17:50:52 · answer #10 · answered by Phil S 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋