he was a good friend of georgy Bush, georgy got his presi.
2006-08-20 10:24:02 · 17 answers · asked by Eshmun 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I would vote for a Hussein before I would ever vote for a Bush.
2006-08-20 10:29:19 · answer #1 · answered by ratboy 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The conflict in Iraq has little or no, if something to do with 9/11. the full Iraq mess started long in the previous 9/11. This conflict replaced into introduced approximately by utilising Iraq's persistent, repetetive non-cooperation with the UN protection council, and the shown fact that the UN does no longer implement their very own sanctions. even though it extremely is oftentimes blamed on Bush, it replaced into rather UN inspectors who mentioned that Iraq possessed banned weaponsand later mentioned that Iraq had no longer taken action to disarm as they have been ordered to do by utilising the UN. he's status trial for conflict crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. no longer as a results of fact we do exactly in comparison to him. The trial is being carried out by utilising Iraqis. look, i think of the conflict stinks as much as all and sundry else thinks so, yet i'm unlikely to assume that everybody in touch did no longer play an element in this effect. i'm unquestionably no longer keen to agree which comprise your ststement that Hussein is the worst sufferer of something, for any reason. i think of, that with the intention to make logical judgements approximately any given concern, you may do the final you may to attempt and confirm what the information are. I agree it is not undemanding to do on the grounds that our "elementary, honest, unbiased media" is referred to as a propagandist communicate board. in case you will undergo in techniques interior the days after Hussein replaced into removed from skill, Iraqis have been rather happy that we've been there. it extremely is in elementary terms been the slow p.c.. with which any progression to repair the rustic is being made, and the shown fact that violence nonetheless reigns, regularly as a results of inner secular divisions, that Iraqis have been unfavorable in direction of the presence of yank infantrymen. a central authority can not be created in one day, and the priority is compounded by utilising the make-up of Iraq itself. The infrastructure of the rustic replaced into in shambles in the previous the conflict. It takes time and funds to repair those issues. in case you desire to blame our president, or our government for the conflict, that's rather your prerogative, and that i can not say which you're incorrect. I, individually, am basically bored with the railroading, and scapegoating that has persevered nicely previous the factor of relativity. The primary attractiveness of such one sided theories is stressful. that's my take, and that i'm sticking to it! a minimum of till greater credible advancements are made public.
2016-12-17 14:14:35 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was a "good friend" of George Bush's? I can remember him in years past schmoozing with other presidents. Don't lay all the blame on Bush for what a horrible person he is.
2006-08-20 10:29:58 · answer #3 · answered by grahamma 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Like InkyBob said, better than Bush.
2006-08-20 10:31:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, Sadly Insane wouldn't be a good president for the US.
Wanna know why? He wasn't born here!
Seriously stupid "question"!!!
2006-08-20 10:41:41 · answer #5 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He'd probably be better than Bush.
2006-08-20 11:24:26 · answer #6 · answered by adonis 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well it looks like the damnocrats finally found a candidate that fits their party!!!
2006-08-20 10:39:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He'd be Better than Bushie, but still NO!
2006-08-20 10:38:40 · answer #8 · answered by Tommy D 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jack is a good name for you it goes with ***! Must be another dove-snake(talk peace and spew venom) about your own country!
2006-08-20 10:32:06 · answer #9 · answered by Stand 4 somthing Please! 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Are you kidding? He has a rating of -100%
2006-08-20 10:29:26 · answer #10 · answered by Duke 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋