Bush critics, if you were President, what would you have done instead?

Question

If we stopped going after terrorists, do you think they will stop their aggressions against the U.S.? What are we supposed to do, be nice to the world bullies so they will be nice back?

Please no answers from people with IQ's below 50.

Answer 1

Mind our own business, and don't tell the world how to run it.

Answer 2

First off, take a step back. Are we labelling everything opposite to us as terrorist ? Just because Bush label someone terrorist, means they are terrorists. Bush administration would use the "terrorist" and "war on terror" to convince people and give the administration power to do whatever the administration wants.

- Next, I am all for going after terrorists. But do it smarter, and do it more efficiently. For the invasion of afghanistan, I am for it. And the world are backing us on that. No one ever question us on that. For the iraq, that was a terrible, terrible mistakes. We are the world bullies on the iraq invasion. That was an invasion using a label "terrorist" and "war on terror". That was just plain cow poop.

- Find out what is the reason why there are people against US. Why are there more people joining the terrorist at all cost ? Are we or our alliance doing something the fuel the fire ? What is the root cause they hate america ? Or are they really hate us because they don't like us ?

-Terrorists can not do jack without money. Where do they get these money from and why do these rich people fund them ?
Cut out the $ source and that will be end of terrorists for the good part.

Answer 3

Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown. The act of governing is tasking & people sometimes expect super intelligence or miracles from leaders like the President of the USA.

Every president is assessed & judged based on the legacies of the past presidents. Based on this, most americans (from unscientific opinion poles) have judged Bush a failure. Factors considered are many - economic, political, industrial, military, labor, etc.

Many policies & decisions have counted against this president. For such, you want to ask yourself if the admired past presidents would have taken same actions as did Bush: Invasion of Iraq based on faulted intelligence, the 9/11 controversies http://www.infowars.com/alexjones.html , the Social Security timebomb, delayed rescue for Katrina victims, leakage of CIA agent, deplorable Health Insurance, etc. You can add to the list.

I don't claim capability of leading this nation, but let whoever takes the seat have the qualities & characters of magnitude expected of an american president.

Answer 4

No but can the conservatives please stop giving our enemy's weapons, training, and money. Reagan and Bush did all of the above in the 80's. And who did they help? Bin Laden, Iran, Saddam, Taliban.

And how about this? LETS ACTUALLY GO AFTER BIN LADEN!!!!! Instead of lying to America to get us into a war, and ignore Bin Laden lets actually get Bin Laden. That's like your neighbor beats up your wife, so you go after your uncle. Doesn't make much sense does it.

And Conservatives please stop trying to give our ports over to country's linked to terrorism. And please quit trying to form relations with dictators who have killed countless people in the name of Allah (momar Qaddafi).

1. Go after Bin Laden
2. Keep pressure on weapons inspections for Iraq
3. Crush the Taliban
4. Put most troops into the Afghanistan - Pakistan border
5. Be a little more fair when it comes to Israel
6. Get counter-terror training from Israel, which never has terrorism in it's airports.
7. Increase propaganda through-out middle east (Joseph Goebbels would be proud)
8. Increase alternative fuel technology and production (Bush cut this in half, of course it's not because he's an oil guy or anything)
9. Try to unite America and both party's. Everybody needs to stick together

ANSWER YOUR QUESTION!!

Answer 5

1) remove troops from Saudi Arabia and stop backing the King of Saudi Arabia.

2) promote a neutral country like Austria or Switzerland to mediate between the Arabs and Israelis

3) encourage the creation of a UN or NATO international force so that American taxpayers are not alone in paying to police the world!

Answer 6

If you watch only one conspiracy documentary ever, make it this one. This just might be the best introductory video out there. Understand that every claim made in this is fact, not opinion, no matter how wild it sounds. It's all easily verifiable through mainstream news archives and public documents.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7048572757566726569&q=Alex+Jones

Answer 7

I'm not a Bush critic, but I'd like to weigh in with this....

I would restore unlimited power to the CIA, enhance it with every resource I had available, and turn them loose on terrorists worldwide. I would also enlist Tom Clancy as one of their consultants.

Let's roll...

I think sweet brunette is really a blonde. United Nothing does just that.... nothing!

'Nuff said?

Answer 8

The Liberals would still be trying to "sit down and discuss" things with Bin Laden.

Answer 9

Starting two wars is not going after terrorists, it is starting two wars. These wars are acts of terrorism themselves, in my opinion. Fighting fire with fire doesn't work.

Yes, being nice might work - they don't hate us for no reason, you know. We infidels did something to piss them off - they didn't just randomly attack the country for no reason.

Answer 10

I would have made a surprise detour from Baghdad to Iraq, and dropped a nuke to cut the head of Islamofascism and deal with Iran before it is too late.

Answer 11

I don't care to answer your stupid question because I don't believe that people with IQ's below 50 should be able to ask questions.