2006-08-20 09:27:00 · 16 answers · asked by one 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I know the USA has some... and I think the USA has pretty good idea on how to NOT use them.
2006-08-20 09:32:01 · answer #1 · answered by MK6 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm guessing your refering to the suspected WMD's in Iraq. There are theories that they had been moved to Syria. I however simply believe Saddam was a GREAT Poker player. He managed to BLUFF the entire world into believing he had WMD's. Both Bill Clinton and GWB fell for this Bluff. Clinton fired Missiles into Iraq in 98 attempting to destroy WMD stockpiles. GWB wasn't satisfied with simply firing Missiles he called Saddams Bluff and went in. I'm affraid we will never know if teh Syria theory is correct thats why I go with mine.
2006-08-20 09:44:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Donald Rumsfeld.Sunday, March 30, 2003 -
MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Finally, weapons of mass destruction. Key goal of the military campaign is finding those weapons of mass destruction. None have been found yet. There was a raid on the Answar Al-Islam Camp up in the north last night. A lot of people expected to find ricin there. None was found. How big of a problem is that? And is it curious to you that given how much control U.S. and coalition forces now have in the country, they haven't found any weapons of mass destruction?
SEC. RUMSFELD: Not at all. If you think -- let me take that, both pieces -- the area in the south and the west and the north that coalition forces control is substantial. It happens not to be the area where weapons of mass destruction were dispersed. We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat.
OF COURSE he was full of S###.
http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2003/t03302003_t0330sdabcsteph.html
***********************************************************
as for fox's claims about WMD's
http://mediamatters.org/items/200607070007
*********************************************************
As to the Syria claims.
http://mediamatters.org/items/200506070006
the real threat or rather what we should concern ourselves with is
WMD's that are in russia, they are not accounted for warheads, Kerry said he was going to secure loose nukes.
2006-08-20 09:40:00 · answer #3 · answered by nefariousx 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, that is mathematically no longer plausible. you may create a structure without more desirable than 2 unusual nodes. The x interior a sq. has 4 unusual ones. the rationalization you may do it in case you turn it into an "envelope" structure is it ameliorations to of the unusual nodes to even. then you may do it as long as you commence and end on between the unusual nodes (on the bottom)
2016-11-26 20:11:56 · answer #4 · answered by parvin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Check out this link. It states what countries have WMD's by category.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/wmd_state.htm
2006-08-20 09:44:50 · answer #5 · answered by P L 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
USA, China, Korea, Russia, France, India, Pakastan are the only ones I know of. But Bush knows best and we will all pay the price for this idiots actions, Yale should be real proud of this as*hole.
2006-08-20 09:36:33 · answer #6 · answered by Later Me 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The USA, Russia, China have most of them. The other nations are working on getting them.
2006-08-20 09:33:44 · answer #7 · answered by timer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes! In the U.S. arsenal. Isn't it ironic that we're so touchy about anyone else having them. Sort of like, "No guns allowed in the school except by our gang!"
2006-08-20 09:40:33 · answer #8 · answered by beast 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i know only one fact:
The only nation in history that have used the Atomic Bomb against "civilians" -Twice -is The United States of America !!
2006-08-20 09:51:26 · answer #9 · answered by Sheefa 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If tou mean the ones saddam had, he moved them to Syria before our troops got there.
2006-08-20 09:38:10 · answer #10 · answered by Lambert_58 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋