-2*(2*arctan(sqrt(x+ 4))-sqrt( x + 4))
2006-08-20 09:05:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by a_liberal_economist 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
New and improved:
(X+3)/[(x+5)* sqrt(x+4)], let y = x+4 then dy = dx
(y - 1)/[(y + 1)* sqrt(y)] =
y/[(y + 1)* sqrt(y)] - 1/[(y+1)* sqrt(y)]
work with this 1st work with this second
1st formula: which is
sqrt(y)/(y+1) , now let y = Z^2 then dy = 2z dz
2z^2/ (z^2 + 1), when you do the division we get
2 - 2/(z^2 + 1), then we integrate
intergral 2 dz - integral 2/(z^2 + 1) dz
intergral 2 dz -Integral 2/(z^2 + 1)dz = Integral 2 dz - 2Arctan(z), but z = sqrt(y) = sqrt(X+4)
there for the 1st formula becomes
2 sqrt(x+4) - 2Arctan(sqrt(x+4)) + C1
Now look at the second formula, ignoring for now the -1 coeff
1/[(y+1)*sqrt(y)] dy, again let y = z^2 then dy = 2z dz
2z/[(Z^2 + 1)*z] dz= 2/(z^2 + 1] dz
integrate 2/(z^2 + 1) dz = 2*Arctan(z) = 2Arctan(sqrt(y)) =
2Arctan(sqrt(x+4)) + c2
Now remember the -1 coeficient and add both formulas
2sqrt(x+4) - 4Arctan(sqrt(x+4)) + C
It is not impossible that I could have made a mistake, I am abit too lazy to check, a derivative should give the original problem
2006-08-20 17:12:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
3
2006-08-20 16:00:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by coolcapricorn93 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
â - Integral sign.
â (x+3)/((x+5)²(x+4)) dx (Partical fractions).
â a/(x+5) + â b/(x+5)² + â c/(x+4) dx
â 1/(x+5) + â 2/(x+5)² + â -1/(x+4) dx
â 1/(x+5) + â 2/(x+5)² - â 1/(x+4) dx
â 1/(x+5) + 2â (x+5)^-² - â 1/(x+4) dx
ln(x+5) + [2(x+5)^-1]/-1 - ln(x+4) + c
ln(x+5) - 2/(x+5) - ln(x+4) + c
2006-08-20 19:19:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Brenmore 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
using the program "Maple 10" ...
The answer is : 2*sqrt(x+4)-4*arctan(sqrt(x+4))
Don't know how to solve it by myself. Maybe if you say something like....sqrt(x+4) = sin(x) . But, really didn't try it. :-)
Well just use the answer that Maple gives.
2006-08-20 16:10:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by gnusselt 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dont know too complicated
2006-08-20 15:59:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by starz81 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
what are the limits?
the old school method is like this
[dinominator*derivative of num -- num*deriv. of din.]
___________________________________________
[dinominator]^2
2006-08-20 16:15:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by akbarshahin 1
·
0⤊
0⤋