English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

No i think Iraqi is enough at the moment.

2006-08-20 07:58:15 · answer #1 · answered by mick 6 · 0 0

It all depends on this November election. If the democrats get control of the House/Senate, there is no way they would approve of any further military authority for Bush. If not, then it is a possibility.

Btw, Iran would never start a war with us. Iran has no history of ever being the aggressor of any war they have been involved in. If it does happen, it will be us or Israel attacking them.

2006-08-20 15:08:29 · answer #2 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0 3

Or worse yet will Iran Commit one aganst the US .
Let us not forgett we did shoot down a airplane that was theres,
in the late 80's.

2006-08-20 15:02:28 · answer #3 · answered by Fatwa Freddie 3 · 1 0

Yes

America wants a WAR this whole Iraq thing is a peace keeping mission to bring democracy to a troubled Nation.

But the daily viewing of dead Islamofascists has got Americans smelling fresh blood. They want real war with big body counts like back in WWII when 100,000 would die in one day.

Just like Iran never forgot that Alexander burned down the palace of King Darius. America will never forget that Iran burned down our Embassy.

Go big Red Go

2006-08-20 15:05:35 · answer #4 · answered by 43 5 · 0 3

No they haven't done any thing yet. President Ford gave the Sha of Iran Nuclear intelligence for power plants when he was President. The Iranians havn't attacked anyone or left their borders. They could have during the Iraq war, but they stayed out of it. Bush is just a bully flexing his muscles with American lives and military technology. Bush's administration sucks as diplomat's.

2006-08-20 15:14:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Iran is begging for it. Soon I hope.
Please use spell checker

2006-08-20 15:03:35 · answer #6 · answered by Buzzy360comeCme 2 · 1 0

No we're going to try the blazingly pointless diplomatic route, everytime they try it it fails.
You can't negotiate, sign treaties with, or appease the criminally insane.

2006-08-20 15:01:48 · answer #7 · answered by Archer Christifori 6 · 1 0

yep if attacked.

dont rule out nuclear use in this case though.
or in korea's case either.

we are close to being forced to use nuclear response as a real option.

2006-08-20 15:20:48 · answer #8 · answered by pcreamer2000 5 · 1 0

Iran is a threat and should be dealt with accordingly!!!

2006-08-20 15:00:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

O yes..another Iraq, another 9 /11 another Pearl Harbor....

They are the Illuminatis, and they own you,
This is the New World Order, and it is your future if the world don't wake up :

And this is what Bush’s minions had to say in 2000;-
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Confessions (Nuremberg Diary)
http://www.snopes2.com/quotes/goering.htm

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the United Nations Business Council in September 1994

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)

Make you investigations about Jesuits, the New World Order, the Illuminatis, the Free-Masonery, the Death Clan. They plan a world reduction of population of 80%...Far worse than Hitler...

1. Monetary and sex bribery was to be used to obtain control of men already in high places in the various levels of all governments and other fields of endeavor. Once influential persons had fallen for the lies, deceits, and temptations of the Illuminati, they were to be held in bondage by application of political and other forms of blackmail, threats of financial ruin, public exposure, and physical harm, even death to themselves and loved members of their families.

2. The Illuminati who were on the faculty of colleges and universities were to cultivate students possessing exceptional mental ability and who belonged to well-bred families with international leanings, and recommend them for special training in Internationalism. Such training was to be provided by granting scholarships, like the Rhodes Scholarship, to those selected by the Illuminati. All such scholars were to be first persuaded and then convinced that men of special talent and brains had the right to rule those less gifted on the grounds that the masses do not know what is best for them physically, mentally, and spiritually.

2006-08-20 15:00:15 · answer #10 · answered by The Patriot 4 · 0 6

fedest.com, questions and answers