One day the poor are going to get a contagious disease (SARS -C dificul etc) and without universal health care they will die and start an epedemic killing the rich too.
So when some rich *** daddy's little girl dies of a disease after he spent 2 million on dr's will he ever realise that it was him who denied the poor health care that killed his daughter?
No he will just sue the dr and go on as ignaorantly as before
2006-08-20 07:11:29 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
As an uninsured diabetic this is a subject that is close to my heart, in this rich country no one should be without proper health care, there are medicines that I should be taking that I am not because they are just to damn expensive. As usual it is the rupuglicans in this country that block universal health care, there is another reason to remove them from office. The insurance company's are the real source of the problem her as they dump billions into the repuglicans pockets to keep from having the health care that we the American citizens deserve.
2006-08-20 07:20:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
We already have universal health-care. Anyone without insurance must be treated by hospitals so your scenario can never happen. The only thing wrong with the system today is that the middle class picks up the tab with higher insurance rates instead of the rich picking up the tab via our progressive tax system.
2006-08-20 08:01:29 · answer #2 · answered by remmo16 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What is the reason for question??? What does rich have
to do with Socialist universal health care???
2006-08-20 07:34:10 · answer #3 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
prevalent wellness care. interior of america, drugs-for-income has did no longer grant low value wellness care to a great form of individuals (around 50 million), on the same time as increasing expenditures ascertain that a good greater proportion would be no longer able to discover the money for it sooner or later. there's a reason that something of the developed international has observed prevalent wellness care.
2016-10-02 08:05:41 · answer #4 · answered by valma 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Any system that tells 45 million Americans they must die if they can't pay exorbitant health insurance premiums is not "working just fine".
Between greedy doctors, insurance companies and the pharmaceutical companies, American wealth is being transferred from the many to the few.
2006-08-20 07:39:47 · answer #5 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Capitalism is about making money and progress, those worthless people need to get off their *** and DO something rather than wait patiently for their hand outs. Yes, I am poor, but I work hard and save money in case I have a medical energency. I don't rely on other people to support me. Neither should they.
2006-08-20 07:20:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I hate to upset all you political extremists in the USA but doesn't it say something when the worlds richest, most powerful country has a less caring, more difficult health service to access than Cuba.
2006-08-20 09:29:17 · answer #7 · answered by bob kerr 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes we should all put in our money so we can share a flu shot and the little lollypop the doctor gives us. personally im not rich but my company pays for a lot of medical stuff. i dont really support government programs. i think it should almost all be private. i hate paying a fat chunk of my paycheck just so other random people i have never met or care about can use it and they will never contribute back in.
2006-08-20 07:19:41 · answer #8 · answered by BEEFSHIELD 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it is the rich per cay but the insurance company's that depend on us being forced to pay their charges and make them richer than they already are.
2006-08-20 07:19:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I am so with you, Brother...
2006-08-20 07:17:35 · answer #10 · answered by lockesmith 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋