Why were there some rocks with letters on them on the surface of the moon?

Question

There is a letter "C", as if marking a Hollywood studio prop, on one of the rocks supposedly on the moon in this image.

http://www.xenophilia.com/zb/zb0003/Cshad.gif

In the original image taken by NASA the "C" appeared in the picture but in later years it was cancelled. And the true fact is that in some nasa images you could see the "C" and in others you couldnt.

Most people give excuses that, that was a reproduction flaw, but how can it be when the letters are so much aligned with the rock itself.

For those of you who think Neil Armstrong really landed on the moon, then where did that rock come from? Please be more specific and back up your claims with some solid evidence so that I can believe you.

There is no need of people getting anry with the question. What i want is evidence to back up the fact that neil armstrong went to the moon. Then i will probably believe you guys. If you tell me you "went to the moon", "went to the moon","went to the moon", without any solid evidence to prove it then there will still be a question mark there.

There is no need of people getting anry with the question. What i want is evidence to back up the fact that neil armstrong went to the moon. Then i will probably believe you guys. If you tell me you "went to the moon", "went to the moon","went to the moon", without any solid evidence to prove it then there will still be a question mark there.

Also watch this video to confiirm:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1645994816867782932&q=a+funny+thing+happened+on+the+way+to+the+moon

Answer 1

you have seen the google video on the link and i'm sure you are convinced that all these so called lunar landings by the different apollo missions are nothing but hoax the letter "c" written on that rock denotes "center" meaning the camera should be focused on that spot see all those cross hairs there were 5 of them one is on the center 1 on the upper left 1 on the bottom left 1 on the upper right 1 on the bottom right the hasselblad camera was designed in a very special purpose exclusively for the apollo use these cross hairs were for distance measuring purposes

try to analyze the way the astronauts on the moon when contacted by mission control in houston their radio transmission has a gap of only about 3 seconds if you see live news feed by cnn in hongkong and their field reporters in lebanon the gap is almost about 4 seconds

Answer 2

It was probably just a trick of lighting. If all the photos that revealed the C taken at roughly the same time or just at the right angle, then that is why some show it and some don't.

Besides both c's look different, which means that it is not a trademark, because a trademark would have used the same font.

Also even if those are indeed c's, have you ever seen a horse in the clouds? Less then a year ago there was a potato chip that was shapped like a boot that was sold on ebay. is it a conspiracy that it is infact boots running the lay's corporation and they want the credit therefore they sent us a sign, or could it just be a coincidence? Frankly coincidences happen and you could spend all day finding some bizzare meaning for them.

My next case would be can you trust the source of the photo? There is a lot of farout and flat out absurd things on the internet.

Finally while people complain about us not actually landing on the moon, we are happily bouncing lasers from it calculating its exact distance, and making use of other technology we left there. Until people can explain how it is that we didnt land on the moon, and yet our technology still is there, then i am inclined to believe we did land on the moon.

Answer 3

We landed on the moon. Neil Armstrong walked on it. Why is that so hard to believe?

Proof we landed on the MOON:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMINSD7MmT4

That's all the proof anyone should need.......

Oh, and if you STILL don't believe it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQKxAqpjroo


Sometimes I think that if NASA sent all of the conspiracy nuts to the moon just to prove we did, they still wouldn't believe it.

Answer 4

"Why were there some rocks with letters on them on the surface of the moon?"

That's a two part question.

1. "Why". “Why?” is a very good question. It has been discussed for thousands of years. Socrates asked Plato. Plato asked Homer. Homer asked Jethro. None of them could answer the question “WHY?”.

2. ”Were there some rocks with letters on them on the surface of the moon?" No, but there are two golf balls with writing on them. (See Alan Shepard)

Answer 5

>>The technologies wasn't round in'sixty 9.<< Oh certain it became. The technologies of rockets became round because the 20s. The technologies of the 60s gave us supersonic bomber plane, nuclear guns, submarines, etc. through the time of the first moon landing there have been many unmanned lunar probes, or perhaps probes to Mars and Veuns. So what made the manned landing so a lot extra sturdy that it became not available to actual benefit? >>Why became there no stars contained in the photographs....<< because stars don’t ensue on movie even as the digicam is desirous to divulge a sunlit scene. The lunar floor became in *daylight hours*. >>why is the flag out right now,even with there being no wind on the moon...<< Why don’t you actual attempt searching on the movie, video and footage. there's a rod in the course of the right of the flag conserving it out, and it became placed there precisely because the flag would not stand pleased with the pole with out it. >>why does Buzz Aldrin's moon walk seem as even with the undeniable fact that he's operating usually even as sped up?<< It doesn’t. and attempt the hours of movie and video from the different missions for further examples of move that seems completely unnatural even as sped up. >>What about the moon rock with the letter "c" marked on it.some say this became borrowed from a props branch at a movie studio!<< did you realize of any get mutually of a movie studio utilising such blatantly marked props contained in the approach a scene? The C is a flaw contained in the image, not on the rock itself. There are 2 pictures of that rock, and there is not any printed version of the 2d that shows that mark. >>What are your perspectives?.......did it ensue or became it only a interest of "one-up-manship"contained in the conflict hostile to communism?<< It befell, and it executed the single-upmanship hostile to communism through tangible beating them to the Moon. >>also, they in no way managed a effective landing in prepare,yet on the moon...ideal first time!<< in no way managed a effective landing in prepare? the position do you get that concept? For one element the LM could not be flown on earth: Apollo 11 *became* the try flight. Secondly, the tutorial motorized vehicle that Armstrong crashed (this is the commonplace source of this declare) worked all precise till it broke, and made 1000's of effective landings.

Answer 6

If you think the US (NASA) staged the moon landings, you need to get your head out of your butt.

Answer 7

Baseless arguement. Moon mission is not intended to make you believe. It achieved its inteneded goals and more

Answer 8

if you couldn't see it in all photos,that must me its just a reproduction error.