English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i need real answers no joks

2006-08-20 04:36:27 · 9 answers · asked by hrh_medo 2 in Health Women's Health

9 answers

abortion is a necessary evil IMO. If a child is going to be born defective or to a parent/s that do not want it or aren't stable enough to care for it-emotionally or financially-why would it be better to let it live? Odds are this poor person will end up emotionally scarred or in a gang or any number of other terrible things. Deformities or mental defects are sadly not accepted by the majority and it will face a life time of humiliation from other people. I think it is cruel to do that to someone, a life isn't worth saving if it's not a worth while life-most probably wish they'd not been born. people will argue it could be the person who finds a cure for cancer...yes or it could be the next osama bin laden also, more often than not in situations such as this the person will not be a productive member of society. Our adoption system is so backed up that it's becoming hard to find parents who want to accept these children so again i think it's a necessary evil

2006-08-20 04:47:19 · answer #1 · answered by scarlet_bat 4 · 1 0

I consider abortion to be a choice that should be made by both the mother AND the father; however it should be a choice regardless. And while I consider myself Pro-Choice, I do have stipulations on that stance.

Specifically, I am morally opposed to abortion to be used as the sole means of birth control (i.e., have consistent unprotected sex and then abort when a pregnancy occurs).
A woman has the right to choose ALL methods of birth control in this country, and as such there should not BE unwanted pregnancies except through the possibility of failed alternate methods (the condom broke, the diaphragm slipped, etc). Today's modern methods leave very little room for error.

In other words, if one or both of you was using responsible birth control consistently (the Pill, condoms, etc), and you STILL end up with an unwanted pregnancy, and you have explored all reasonable options, then yes by all means consider abortion.

Also, a pregnancy as a result of rape or incest should ALWAYS be considered able to be terminated.

Also, if one becomes pregnant, the termination should be performed as SOON as possible - I do NOT support late-term abortions (my definition being after the 4th month) unless there is something SERIOUSLY wrong with the fetus, or the mother's life is in immanent danger if she carries the pregnancy to term.

I do think it is an important right that we as women have. I do NOT believe that I should be told what to do with my body by some 78 year old geezer on Capitol Hill whom I've never met and who doesn't know anything about me or my circumstances.

2006-08-20 05:05:28 · answer #2 · answered by Brutally Honest 7 · 1 0

Abortion always kills an innocent human being and is always wrong. Please check out:

Photos of Abortions, Including 1st Trimester Abortions:
http://www.cbrinfo.org/Resources/pictures.html

A Four-Minute, Must-See Video on Abortion:
http://www.abort73.com/HTML/I-A-4-video.html

Information on All Aspects of Abortion:
http://Abort73.com

Photos and Facts About Prenatal Development:
http://www.justthefacts.org/clar.asp
http://www.abort73.com/HTML/I-A-2-prenatal.html
http://www.studentsforlife.uct.ac.za/foetal%20dev%20photos.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/3847319.stm

Pain Perception in the Unborn:
http://www.advocatesfortheinnocent.com/fetalpain.html

Rape and Abortion:
http://www.deathroe.com/Pro-life_Answers/Answers.cfm?ID=31
http://www.afterabortion.info/Victims/index.htm
http://www.family.org/fofmag/sl/a0039249.cfm
http://www.afterabortion.info/PAR/V2/n1/RAPESUM.htm

Is Abortion Ever Necessary to Save the Life of the Mother?
http://www.all.org/article.php?id=10682
http://www.advocatesfortheinnocent.com/motherslife.html

2006-08-20 12:35:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I'm pro-choice.I would never have one my self (unless I was raped). But if a girl/lady needs one it her choice.
To all the pro-lifer's out there we don't need to know the hole 'its murder spiel'
I must say that I do believe they need to lower the age at which an abortion can be done, 24 weeks is just to late. It should be more like 16 weeks.

2006-08-20 04:49:16 · answer #4 · answered by ***Missy*** 4 · 1 0

I hate it so much. why get an abortion when there is so many men and woman out there that cant have kids. Thats just wrong. get them up for adoption not abortion. thats like murder I think it is. I want to stop it

2006-08-20 06:49:21 · answer #5 · answered by beggin09 3 · 0 0

I am normally against abortion, but I think it is the woman's/girl's choice, especially if they were raped. I never judge people that have had an abortion, cuz I have no idea what they have gone through.

2006-08-20 06:19:46 · answer #6 · answered by REDHED4 2 · 0 0

I don't believe in abortion unless is for medical reasons. Such as when the mother has been in contact with someone with measles, or when the mother could die if she carries the baby to term. That is it for me.

2006-08-20 04:57:30 · answer #7 · answered by Boricua Born 5 · 0 0

I beleve that its okay to have an abortion if the person was raped, the baby will have a non curable disease when born, or if either the mother or kid will die during child birth.

2006-08-20 04:47:41 · answer #8 · answered by wildfatwilly 1 · 1 0

Abortion is an option. Abortion is a right. Abortion is a choice.

Don't listen to the judgemental pro-lifers on here.
"Pro-lifers" (or ANTI-CHOICERS) are ignorant, uneducated, and CONTRADICTORY. They are not really pro-life as they claim to be.

If they were pro-life, they would NOT support a war killing thousands of REAL, INNOCENT children as opposed to an insignificant embryo or fetus. (The majority of pro-lifers are conservative republicans who SUPPORT the war.)

If they were pro-life, they would not support killing animals just to satisfy their taste buds, or to make a fashion statement (furs, animal skins, etc).

If they were pro-life, they would not kill insects.

If they were pro-life, they would not support "pro-lifers" who bomb abortion clinics, kill doctors who perform abortions, harass innocent employees at abortion clinics, nor would they do it themselves.

If they were pro-life, they would not support the dealth penalty.

If they were pro-life, they would adopt many many children since they supposedly "care so much" and want to make sure that all people considering abortions carry the pregnancy to term and give the child up for adoption.

If they were pro-life, they would NEVER make statements like "you should have been aborted".

If they were pro-life, they would be genuinely nice and understanding, and they would NEVER gossip about people, insult people, or hate people. Why are some pro-lifers SO mean? If they really cared about the lives of others, would they be mean, and judgemental? No, they wouldn't! Why aren't they nice to everyone? Since they are mean to people and hate people, that means it wouldn't matter to them if those people died, So why do they care about the lives of certain "people", and not others? That's not fair, and that's contradictory.

MY body, MY life, MY reproductive system, MY fetuses and embryos, MY business, MY choice.

Since when is a piece of flesh more important than a grown woman? Who cares if it has a heartbeat? The fetus or embryo may have a heartbeat, but that is NOT life. It is not a baby until it is viable. It can not survive without the mother's body, and the mother should not be forced to have her body used as an incubator. It's HER body. Forcing a woman to carry a child she does not want is more disgusting than rape. Statistics show that women who had forced pregnancies and gave their children up for adoption suffer more than women who have been raped. Rape is a quick thing. If you were already sexually active before being raped, it will not be so hard to deal with. But having to carry an unwanted child for 9 months and then having to give it up? That's extremely painful physically and emotional. That is over 9 months of physical struggles, and a lifetime of emotional struggles.

Also, the fetus may be "alive", but is it life? No! It's not. It is not yet living a real life. It is just a piece of flesh with a heartbeat. I can think of MANY more things with a heart beat which pro-lifers do NOT care about.

Did you know that illnesses are LIVING ORGANISMS? Yes, AIDS, and CANCER are LIVING. Does that mean that you should live with them, and let yourself die?

Did you know that tumors have PULSES? Yes, tumors have pulses and they are LIVING ORGANISMS. Does that mean you should let the tumor destroy your body?

I have plenty more examples showing how pro-lifers are contradictory, but I won't waste time.

We all know pro-lifers are uneducated, ignorant, and the only purpose of their life is to follow their bullsh*t religion so they can get to "heaven". They haven't got minds of their own, and are gullible enough to believe what the bible has to say.

The arguments pro-lifers make about abortion are wrong, anyway. They ALWAYS mention "God" when debating about abortion. WELL PRO-LIFERS, GUESS WHAT? You're wrong! There is NO proof of "God" therefore the "facts" you provide are FICTION!

Every pro-lifer should get a life, and leave everybody alone. My body is none of their business. My reproductive system is none of their business. My fetuses and embryos are none of their business. Have they nothing better to do than harass people all day? Are they THAT pathetic, and bored?

ALL pro-lifers are contradictory and their arguments are ridiculous. They say the stupidest things like:

"Why kill an innocent baby when you can give it to a family that wants kids but can't have kids?"

-First of all, other families are none of my business. Why should I waste 9 months of my life going through physical and emotional hell just so I can make a random couple happpy?
Second of all, There are already SO many unwanted children in this world. There are so many orphanages and foster homes, and NOBODY cares about the children in them. If there were really "SO many people who want kids but cant have them", then there wouldn't be any unwanted children out there!
Why bring another unwanted children into this already over-populated world?
Also, why don't pro-lifers adopt a few children themselves?
...I just proved that pro-lifers don't know what they are talking about and that they are CONTRADICTORY.


"if you're not ready for a child, you're not ready for sex! if you're not ready to face the consequences, don't spread your legs!"

-That is NOT true. Sex is a natural, beautiful, pleasurable thing which everybody should experience whether they are ready for children or not. Having children is not the only purpose of sex. If sex existed solely for reproducing, then orgasms would not exist! Sex is here for us to enjoy, not only to have children.
Also, there are SO many people who already have a few children, are happily married, but are NOT ready for more children. For example, Would you say that a middle aged woman who has children and is married but is NOT emotionally, physically, and financially ready for another child is not ready for sex? Of course you wouldn't! But of course that woman still has sex despite the fact that she's not ready for more children.
...Once again, I have proved that pro-lifers don't know what they are talking about and that they are contradictory.


"if you saw somebody trying to kill their child in the street of course you would do something about it"

-Yes, i'd do something about it, but that is totally irrelevant. That has NOTHING to do with abortion.
You can NOT compare a real child to a fetus or embryo.
Who cares if you terminate a pregnancy when the fetus or embryo can't feel anything and is NOT aware of anything occuring as opposed to a child that can feel and is aware?
It has been scientifically proven that a fetus can NOT feel anything before 20 weeks. 90% of abortions are terminated long before 20 weeks; long before the fetus can feel anything.
Even if a woman has an abortion after 20 weeks when the fetus can feel, who cares? The emotional and physical pain the mother goes through is much worse than the pain the fetus is going through. The fetus will only "feel pain" for a short while as opposed to a woman who will feel pain and discomfort for over 9 months. Also, the fetus's brain is not developed enough to acknowledge the situation. Why do you think nobody remembers being in their mother's stomach?
...Once again, I have proved pro-lifers wrong.

"what if your baby wouldve found the cure for aids or cancer?!?!"

-There are "what ifs" in EVERY situation no matter how minor or major it is. You can NOT justify something or say something is wrong based on "what ifs".
Here is a question I have for you, pro-lifers: "What if the baby would've been the next hitler?"
...Once again, MY argument WINS.


For the men: You don't have a right to oppose abortion, and you do NOT have the right to speak out against it. You also do NOT have the right to criticise women who have had abortions.
Let me tell you when you will be able to oppose abortion. You will be able to oppose abortion the day your PENIS turns into a VAGINA, the day you GROW A UTERUS, the day you get a MENSTRUAL PERIOD, the day your body CHANGES TO ACCOMODATE AN EMBRYO OR FETUS INSIDE OF IT, and the day YOU GET PREGNANT. That is the day you will be allowed to speak out against abortion. Too bad that will NEVER happen, so keep your ignorant opinions to yourself.

2006-08-20 15:01:39 · answer #9 · answered by Stella 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers