2006-08-20 04:08:07 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Thats a tough one.
Nope - can't split them it has to be both and the world is and will continue to suffer for for his legacy for many many years after he goes.
2006-08-20 08:11:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
More of a reign of error. I have not been terrorized by the Bush administration. Now error fits more to the idiot in the White House. The first time he was elected, I voted for him. He seemed less of threat to America at the time. The second time, I wasted my vote and voted for some third party, I think the Libertarians. I just hope both parties give us someone to vote for. Sorry I kinda got off subject.
2006-08-20 11:16:26 · answer #2 · answered by kepjr100 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Reign of Anti-Terror
2006-08-20 11:13:54 · answer #3 · answered by dollhaus 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Reign of Error
2006-08-20 11:13:35 · answer #4 · answered by Jason N 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
A reign of terror thru incompetence and greed.
2006-08-20 11:23:52 · answer #5 · answered by Kenneth H 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Reign of error.
2006-08-20 11:15:13 · answer #6 · answered by Mojo Seeker Of Knowlege 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Reign of Error - he hasn't done one thing right yet. The law of averages says that before his term is up, he should get at least one thing correct, but the clock is ticking....
2006-08-20 11:58:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
How about Reign against terrorism and the damnocrats who support terrorist?
2006-08-20 11:16:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
The liberal weanies said much the same thing about Reagan but time has proven the Gipper was right all along.
The same will be true for President Bush.
2006-08-20 11:45:59 · answer #9 · answered by John16 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Reign of Error.
This is a president who was elected on fraud and mistakes.
This is a president who has made thousands of mistakes in his presidency.
2006-08-20 12:21:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋