Should we Impeach Bush for ignoring signs of dangering us?

Question

I can't beleive we were quick to asking to have clinton impeached for having sex yet president bush ignored a memo sent to him in august about a possible event and then lying about weapons of mass distruction in Iraq which was all lies then wire tapping which he got caught without permission and who know maybe even bought his presidency for a second term hum this looks like impeachment for me.

President Bush lied and said that Iraq had weapons of mass distruction where are the weapons he so called said they had.

Answer 1

He should be impeached on the basis of his IQ alone....

Too bad Americans judge their governments by their leaders and are so divided too...remember united you stand divided you fall. You should demand more of the people you vote in for candidates and pay attention to their debates and have expectations of them, and then VOTE come election time...you're paying the price for being complacent andnot doing so as a result...they know they can walk all over the American people because most simply don't give a **** about anything and never vote but when a disaster like New Orleans happen you finally wake up and smell the coffee because you finally can picture yourself in that position and know what you could expect of your government.

You should be yelling and screaming at your government reps and make thier lives HELL and conduct protests etc. like they do everywhere else. Make them listen and perhaps then something will change, but I honestly think at this point you have a long, long, long way to go to ever get there.

You need to create a THIRD party of government and get them empowered much like we have up in Canada...that keeps the other two ON THEIR TOES. We actually voted the NDP into power once, which proved disastrous due to thier lack of inability never having been in power before, but it sent a STRONG message to the others, and they very quickly started listening to the people and meeting our demands. They work for us, not the other way around. That is what is lacking in America. You are in many ways, not as free as you would like to think you are.

Answer 2

I'm not a Republican but I'm afraid you're forcing me to take their side on this one.

No, I would not impeach Bush for the same reasons I argued against impeaching Clinton. Impeachment is supposed to be reserved for "high crimes and misdemeanors" such as treason and bribery.

How many memos does Bush get in a day? How can you expect him to read them all? I'll bet you could find similar evidence against ANY president.

There is no evidence that Bush committed any crimes against the U.S. Plenty of theories and rumors, sure, but no actual proof of any of it.

If you think he's a bad president, then just be glad that he can't run for president again in 2008.

Answer 3

Actually, the Iraqis fired illegal missiles at us at the start of the war that they said they didn't have and was on the banned list. We have also found chemical and biological weapons hidden amongst normal weapons since the beginning. The wire tapping and the other ways that is being used to collect intelligence is to PROTECT us. The one court that was set up to sign the warrants had failed to do their job to protect Americans. I have seen reports where this court used a rubber stamp and approved like 90% of all warrants until Bush when they dropped it to like 20%. When will people like you do some actual research and stop listening to the people who are actually helping the enemies.

Answer 4

Yes I think we should. But we should stick to a very narrow, very real, case. I think we could prove that without difficulty. The only thing that worries me about impeachment is that it will become a common thing. Clinton was impeached, Bush was impeached so the next president is going to have lots of people wanting to impeach them just for pay back. That was the problem with impeaching Clinton for a nothing sort of "crime". Had we not done that I think we could get a lot more support for getting rid of Bush for his Major Major screw-ups

Answer 5

Your information is wrong. Clinton was not impeached for having an adulterous affair with an intern. He was impeached for lying under oath to the Congress about that adultery. I can also confer that you don't know who Dr. Rihab Rashid Taha al-Azawi is either. She is the creator of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction arsenal which were used on the Kurds and Iranians. Do you know what weapons of mass destruction are? And I don't see anything wrong or illegal with listening in on telephone conversations of people who communicate with KNOWN TERRORISTS in other countries while we are at war. Hum, this looks like your an ignorant uneducated hillary traitor liberal to me who needs to be arrested and charged with sedition(by the way her name does not deserve to be capitalized just in case you missed that one).

Answer 6

In the first Clinton wasn't impeached for having a BJ in the Oval Office... He was impeached for lying about it under oath.. That's perjury... The rest of that stuff is crap and not even true. Get a life.

Answer 7

I won't even start bashing here, even though I am vigorously rolling my eyes...I really blame the Liberal Media for brainwashing most of you guys, as it really isn't your fault you only researched one side of the issue...just like it isn't anybody's fault if they do something wrong according to the democrats..that is if your not a Republican...according to you guys, all roads lead back to Bush...just remember, half of those 3rd world countries didn't even have nuclear technology until Clinton was in office..and he wasn't impeached for having Sex..it was his blatant lying after being caught that got him impeached!!!

Answer 8

NO! i did not imagine Clinton might want to were impeached & i don't believe of Bush should be. all of us knew precisely what this guy became all about in 2004 & we nevertheless voted him decrease back into workplace. We did it, we ought to continuously conflict through through it. as long as we vote party rather of folk we can conflict through this problem. after I study the solutions to questions in this talk board i visit't believe the region of persons on each and each side. Dems or"liberals' are stupid, and so on. & repubs or "conservatives" are warmongers, and so on. those who comprehend little hotel to namecalling. Vote the man, no remember in the journey that they are dems or repubs. Please, your united states will be more desirable helpful for it.

Answer 9

There is no difference between the presidents from 1918 until now. They all work for the same master, and are all working towards completing the Global government a/k/a one world government. The New World Order. We are living in a police state now and it"s going to get worse much worse.
It the American people continue to be dumb, they will die like the Jews did. No question about it.

Answer 10

Kiklee, I don't think it is necessary as he is already in a state of being 'self-impeached' as can be seen from his ever declining rating! Before the curtain finally comes down on his administration, people should simply ignore his existence! Consider having an invisible president like the famous emperor without clothes who though thought that he was fully clothed!