When will liberals come up with some solid solutions to things they say are wrong? You never hear anything productive. All you hear is them bashing our President.
2006-08-20 02:49:24 · 20 answers · asked by Bobby D 2.0 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
LOL! Who said they've seen lots of solutions on this site, but didn't reference them for you to review? LOL!!!
Oh this is a good question. I encourage you to watch the Sunday news programs to see what, if anything, the libs have come up with. Last weekend, the head lib, Howard "Screamin" Dean was on and did not list one single thing! All he could do is scorn the President and, believe it or not, hung on of their own out to dry, the esteemed Senator Lieberman!
It'll be interesting what happens in the 2008 Presidential election. I'm sure hoping the majority of liberals can ween themselves off the pipe long enough to get out and vote this time. They've pissed and moaned about Bush stealing two elections in a row, yet failed to make a decent turnout at the polls both times! WTF!
It's always Bush's fault! LOL
2006-08-20 03:01:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
it truly is only a finished misinform say that liberals don't have any plan for a funds or medicare. The Republicans administration Congress and hence they draft costs and budgets. they have continually proposed issues that they knew Democrats might want to not possibly settle for. a funds without tax will improve on the prosperous and all cuts from classes that benefit the poorest people and no cuts for classes that benefit the wealthy will by no ability bypass the Senate or be signed via the President. The Republicans recognize that. they are only attempting to make it seem as if Democrats do not favor to revive the topics. they are asserting that Dems received't decrease spending yet even as Dems propose reducing a protection rigidity weapon equipment it truly is ineffective Reps say NO! close a protection rigidity base? NO! get rid of subsidies for company farmers? NO! get rid of tax loopholes for the wealthy? NO! so as long as Republicans purely propose cuts that are completely anti-undesirable and professional-wealthy, not something receives carried out. it truly is not the Democrats' duty to signify cuts, it truly is Congress' duty to signify something with a probability of survival and Republicans are completely on appropriate of problems with that procedure.
2016-11-05 05:34:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like you're whining there, frankie. Liberals, liberals, liberals, boo hoo hoo.
Why don't you come up with some solution for getting your soldiers out of a war they shouldnever have been in?
You're not reading. Conservatives across the board have come out to slam Bush's foreign policy lately. They're beginning to acknowledge that the Democrats strategy of increased internal spending and more stringent law enforcement is a more effective way of dealing with terrorism.
But we couldn't expect you to READ, now could we?
2006-08-20 03:00:05 · answer #3 · answered by corpuscollossus 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You know what? When one party rules all three branches of government and 90% of the policies coming out of Washington are dead wrong, who the hell should we blame? If you want solutions, here's what you do: click on my name there. Go to "questions answered" look at political questions. Stop being a smug dumbarse.
And the next time I hear "coward" or "cut and run" from you neo-con cheerleading chickenhawks I'm going to explode. Wasn't "mission accomplished" 2 years ago? What are we cutting and running from? You all sound soooo tough from your barcaloungers.
2006-08-20 03:23:07 · answer #4 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They give a presentation of "having" a different agenda for what-ever reason it may be..Making people believe they can magically solve the problems of the U.S and the world...Mainly what they do is tell all the negative points about what may be happening but will never give their solution....that's because they either don't really have one or if they do, it's probably so idiotic they know "most" people just won't buy it.
2006-08-20 03:04:37 · answer #5 · answered by 2179 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There is no such thing as "liberal" in any sense relevant to your question. You simply assign the term to anyone who disagrees with you, or who points out that you are really naked.
You, whoever you are, obvioukly want simple solutions to complex problems. Like: "let's invade Iraq, stun them with shock and awe, and aw shucks, they'll shower us with flowers!"
Now your friends have stolen and spent the national wealth, mortgaged future generations, bankrupted the treasury and set the dollar on a devaluation course.
Bring on a One Party State. Yay Fascists!!!
2006-08-20 02:58:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
They never come up with any solid solutions because they are the ones causing the problems.
2006-08-20 02:56:15 · answer #7 · answered by Smartassawhip 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
all you neocons here love to stereotype. You can't take the fact that your entire agenda is failing. So you have to take shots at other people because of Dubya's faliures. Just stop insulting the other party, then maybe, politics will get us somewhere. You are just dividing america into colors. Radical Libs try to do the same thing. And it just hurts us, it doesnt help. Lets work together, then maybe we will get some progress in congress
2006-08-20 03:00:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Actually they have quite an agenda;
1) Cut and run from Iraq;
2) Raise taxes to spend more
3) Gay Marriage
4) Special Gay rights
5) Open borders
6) Amnesty to those illegally here now
7) Restore "their" image of America over seas which means hand out lots of money (ie raise taxes)
8) Ban talk radio but hey they love civil liberties
2006-08-20 02:55:35 · answer #9 · answered by netjr 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well maybe you should try listening to some liberals, look at the mess the Conservatives have got the world in.
2006-08-20 03:08:41 · answer #10 · answered by Zen 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋