http://www.buildfreedom.com/tl/afdvtrth.shtml
2006-08-19 22:32:00 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
It is true, the federal income tax act is not ratified by the several states. It is not constitutional law. The only lawful tax is real property or "earned income". Meaning income earned by business because of employees work. Earned wages was never meant to be taxed.
2006-08-26 13:51:33 · answer #1 · answered by rc 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's not suppressed. It's just plain wrong.
You see a version of this crop up every few years. Most of the Supreme Court quotes are either taken out of context, or they are no longer applicable to that issue because of later court rulings.
Anyone who wants to try this can go right ahead. But they still must follow all the laws and are subject to all the same punishments for breaking them. Because those laws are not dependent upon citizenship status, they are dependent upon geography and being within the physical jurisdiction of the courts and police.
All this document does is surrender the benefits of citizenship.
2006-08-20 05:22:23 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes. That is non-sense. The supreme court has ruled repeatedly that regardless of declaring your "indepence as a sovereign individual" you still have the Federal obligation to pay past, current and future Federal taxes that are incurred while you reside within the United States. I doubt the court has ruled on an individual who becomes sovereign who then attempts to marry four wives a dog and a six year-old girl, but I'm confident that the outcome would be the same. In fact, native Americans, who are members of sovereign groups (if they belong to Federally recognized tribes) have no exclusion from paying income tax either.
2006-08-25 17:53:20 · answer #3 · answered by jc20155 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Are you high? This is not a supressed document of the constitution. This document didn't exist when I was in school, (not that long ago.) It is another attempt to get out from under governmental control.
2006-08-19 22:48:00 · answer #4 · answered by Da Yank 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
examine the 10th replace. (examine the full shape whilst your at it). "The powers no longer delegated to america by utilising the form, nor prohibited by utilising it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the human beings." yet we've a topic. The shape replaced into no longer meant to be utilized to an empire. The regulations of the rustic wherein this college is placed stick to. whether it extremely is on US territory, there may well be some situations that could desire to be correct, yet i'm no longer a criminal professional, and that i do no longer understand. do somewhat analyze in case you extremely care. On 2nd theory... The assertion "The powers no longer delegated to america by utilising the form" could lead on me to believe that, state, territory or in spite of, any skill no longer granted implicitly by utilising the form isn't accessible to the Federal government, below any situation.
2016-12-17 13:57:51 · answer #5 · answered by ussery 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Very interesting. Apparently this would be an attempt to get out of paying taxes, among other things.Let me know how that works out for you.
2006-08-19 22:46:57 · answer #6 · answered by hott.dawg™ 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's just a lot of bull fecal matter.I personally have it spread over my lawn to make the grass grow,you do with it as you like my friend.
2006-08-25 06:28:16 · answer #7 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hey what planet did all this alledgedly happen on?
Is it within 80 million light years of reality?
2006-08-26 15:38:45 · answer #8 · answered by juandos 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
no more lies ignores is good
2006-08-27 13:57:02 · answer #9 · answered by hashem a 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow! Thanks again for the info.
2006-08-25 12:40:45 · answer #10 · answered by The Mick "7" 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋